Review Checklist¶

A review checklist is useful only if it catches the real ways this package can drift.

For bijux-proteomics-knowledge, review should distinguish semantic change from storage change before any confidence comes from green checks.

Review Model¶

flowchart TB
    review["review proposed knowledge change"]
    layer{"truth, review state, or storage detail?"}
    examples{"contradiction and confidence examples still honest?"}
    convenience{"downstream convenience rewriting canonical truth?"}
    approve["ready to approve"]

    review --> layer
    layer --> examples
    examples -->|yes| convenience
    examples -->|no| block1["keep reviewing"]
    convenience -->|no| approve
    convenience -->|yes| block2["keep reviewing"]

The checklist exists so a cleaner persistence shape does not get mistaken for a safer truth model.

Review Rules¶

ask whether the change affects evidence meaning, review meaning, or only storage shape
check contradiction and confidence examples before approving
verify that downstream convenience is not rewriting canonical truth

First Proof Check¶

packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/tests
src/bijux_proteomics_knowledge/claims.py and evidence.py
src/bijux_proteomics_knowledge/confidence/segments.py and review.py

Design Pressure¶

The common drift is to approve a storage or ergonomics change that quietly changes what downstream systems are allowed to believe.