Known Limitations¶
Known limitations matter because honest boundaries are part of quality, not an admission of failure.
For bijux-proteomics-lab, limitations are mostly about dependence on upstream recommendations and the difference between a precise record and a complete scientific answer.
Limitation Model¶
flowchart TB
upstream["upstream recommendations and contracts"]
lab["lab planning, outcomes, and durable records"]
science["scientific interpretation remains wider than the record"]
operators["operators still need adjacent handbooks"]
limit["lab cannot answer every upstream or scientific question alone"]
upstream --> lab
lab --> science
lab --> operators
science --> limit
operators --> limit
This page should keep the lab boundary honest. The package can preserve what happened and what was promoted, but it cannot replace upstream reasoning or the broader scientific context around the record.
Review Rules¶
- lab quality still depends on upstream recommendation and contract quality
- persisted records can be precise without answering every scientific question
- operators still need adjacent handbooks when failures originate upstream
First Proof Check¶
packages/bijux-proteomics-lab/testssrc/bijux_proteomics_lab/planning.pyandoutcomes.pysrc/bijux_proteomics_lab/repositories.pyandserialization.py
Design Pressure¶
The easy mistake is to over-read durable records as complete scientific explanation instead of one trustworthy layer inside a larger system story.