Skip to content

Change Validation

Change validation should make it obvious whether a package edit is safe, risky, or mis-scoped.

Validation Model

flowchart LR
    policy["policy or evaluator change"]
    behavior["recommendation behavior evidence"]
    outputs["report and outcome proof"]
    verdict["safe, risky, or mis-scoped"]

    policy --> behavior --> outputs --> verdict

This page should make intelligence validation about explainable recommendation movement. A change is safe only when behavior shifts can be demonstrated and explained through the same policy and reporting surfaces readers will inspect.

Review Rules

  • require evidence that a policy or evaluator change improves or intentionally changes recommendation behavior
  • run report and outcome proof with decision logic changes
  • reject edits that make recommendation drift harder to explain

First Proof Check

  • packages/bijux-proteomics-intelligence/tests
  • src/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/policies.py and evaluators.py
  • src/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/report/ and outcomes.py

Design Pressure

Recommendation quality drifts fast when policy edits are accepted on intuition alone. Validation has to force evidence that the system moved on purpose and that the explanation survived the move.