bijux-proteomics-dev¶
bijux-proteomics-dev is where repository discipline becomes executable code.
This section exists so a maintainer can trace a docs rule, API guard, quality
gate, release check, or security policy back to a checked-in Python owner
instead of relying on folklore.
flowchart TB
question["repository-health question"]
toolkit["bijux-proteomics-dev"]
family["docs, api, quality, security, release helpers"]
tests["maintainer tests"]
outcomes["checked repository outcomes"]
question --> toolkit
toolkit --> family
family --> tests
tests --> outcomes
This section should let a maintainer trace a repository rule back to the exact helper family and then to the tests that keep that rule honest. If it cannot do that, the package is still behaving like implicit CI folklore.
What This Package Proves¶
- repository rules are code, not just conventions written in Markdown
- maintainers can change policy with reviewable ownership and tests
- docs quality, release safety, and schema discipline share one explicit toolkit
Start With¶
- open Module Map when you need the owning helper family immediately
- open Quality Gates, Security Gates, or Documentation Integrity when the symptom is already blocking work
- open Package Overview and Operating Guidelines when the question is where maintainer code should live at all
Read By Responsibility¶
- Schema Governance
for
api/ownership and contract drift control - Release Support for trusted publication guards and version checks
- Documentation Integrity for architecture docs, badge sync, and consistency enforcement
- Scope and Non-Goals to keep the toolkit from swallowing product code
First Proof Check¶
src/bijux_proteomics_dev/docs/src/bijux_proteomics_dev/api/,release/,security/, andquality/packages/bijux-proteomics-dev/tests
Design Pressure¶
The easy failure is to treat maintainer helpers as one black box, which makes it hard to see which family owns a broken repository rule or why.