Quality

bijux-proteomics-lab quality should tell a reviewer what must remain true, what proof is required, and which risks are serious enough to block a change.

Trust Model

flowchart LR
    invariants["invariants"]
    tests["test strategy"]
    validation["change validation"]
    risks["risk register and limitations"]
    decision["trust or block the change"]

    invariants --> tests --> validation --> risks --> decision

This page should make lab quality about durable planning and outcomes, not just execution success. The package stays trustworthy when planning state, outcome state, and persistence behavior remain reviewable and distinct from upstream policy.

Start With

• open Invariants before changing package meaning
• open Change Validation when you need the minimum proof for a real edit
• open Risk Register when the package boundary feels under pressure

Section Pages

• Invariants
• Test Strategy
• Change Validation
• Definition of Done
• Dependency Governance
• Documentation Standards
• Known Limitations
• Review Checklist
• Risk Register

What Quality Means Here

• proving that planning and outcome state remain durable, reviewable, and distinct from upstream policy

First Proof Check

• packages/bijux-proteomics-lab/tests
• src/bijux_proteomics_lab/planning.py and outcomes.py
• src/bijux_proteomics_lab/repositories.py and serialization.py

Design Pressure

Lab quality fails when outcome state becomes easier to mutate than to explain. The section has to keep planning, persistence, and downstream review in the same trust story.