Quality

bijux-proteomics-foundation quality should tell a reviewer what must remain true, what proof is required, and which risks are serious enough to block a change.

Trust Model

flowchart LR
    invariants["invariants"]
    tests["test strategy"]
    validation["change validation"]
    risks["risk register and limitations"]
    decision["trust or block the change"]

    invariants --> tests --> validation --> risks --> decision

This page should frame quality as the review surface for shared meanings. The foundation package is trustworthy only when identifiers, schemas, migrations, and serialization rules stay stable enough for downstream packages to reuse.

Start With

• open Invariants before changing package meaning
• open Change Validation when you need the minimum proof for a real edit
• open Risk Register when the package boundary feels under pressure

Section Pages

• Invariants
• Test Strategy
• Change Validation
• Definition of Done
• Dependency Governance
• Documentation Standards
• Known Limitations
• Review Checklist
• Risk Register

What Quality Means Here

• proving shared meanings stay stable, versioned, and reusable across package boundaries

First Proof Check

• packages/bijux-proteomics-foundation/tests
• src/bijux_proteomics_foundation/schema.py and migrations.py
• src/bijux_proteomics_foundation/serialization.py

Design Pressure

Foundation quality fails when shared meaning can drift quietly behind migration or serialization helpers. The section has to keep canonical meaning and downstream proof tightly linked.