Skip to content

Review Checklist

A review checklist is useful only if it catches the real ways this package can drift.

For bijux-proteomics-intelligence, review should expose which decision lever moved and whether the package is still reasoning from evidence instead of smuggling in new facts.

Review Model

flowchart TB
    review["review proposed intelligence change"]
    lever{"which decision lever changed?"}
    ownership{"evidence semantics still owned by knowledge?"}
    explanation{"reports and outcomes explain the shift?"}
    approve["ready to approve"]

    review --> lever
    lever --> ownership
    ownership -->|yes| explanation
    ownership -->|no| block1["keep reviewing"]
    explanation -->|yes| approve
    explanation -->|no| block2["keep reviewing"]

The reviewer should be able to say what changed in recommendation policy without pretending raw scores explain themselves.

Review Rules

  • ask which decision lever actually changed
  • check reports, briefs, and outcomes before trusting raw scores
  • verify that evidence semantics remain owned by the knowledge layer

First Proof Check

  • packages/bijux-proteomics-intelligence/tests
  • src/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/policies.py and evaluators.py
  • src/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/report/ and outcomes.py

Design Pressure

The easy failure is to approve a result that looks directionally plausible while missing that the explanation surface became thinner or the evidence boundary moved.