Foundation¶
The foundation section explains the durable role of bijux-proteomics-intelligence before it
explains implementation detail. Use it to resolve why decision policy belongs here without pretending to own evidence truth or execution.
That boundary needs more explicit language now because the repository has enough benchmark, workflow, and grounding depth that analytical judgment can no longer hide behind vague prose. This section exists to show where recommendation posture begins, how challenge evidence disciplines that posture, and why explanation must stay visibly downstream from scientific truth.
Why Readers Should Stay Here Longer¶
- this is where the repository shows that recommendation language is not a vague afterthought layered on top of benchmarks
- blinded challenges, counterfactual collapses, regret, and downgrade posture now make analytical judgment inspectable instead of merely assertive
- the package exposes real public routes for how one family sentence survives, weakens, or collapses under withheld evidence
flowchart LR
evidence["evidence input"]
constraints["program constraints"]
policy["scoring and scenario policy"]
explanation["explanations"]
intelligence["intelligence foundation"]
action["downstream action"]
evidence --> intelligence
constraints --> intelligence
policy --> intelligence
intelligence --> explanation
intelligence --> action
What This Section Protects¶
- a visible seam between fact and judgment
- recommendation logic that can be argued about instead of merely obeyed
- explanation surfaces that stay tied to policy rather than pretending to be raw evidence
What This Section Now Carries¶
- recommendation posture that remains separate from evidence truth
- challenge and confidence routes that expose overconfidence, underconfidence, and regret instead of smoothing them away
- explanation surfaces that justify analytical judgment without pretending to be upstream fact
Start With¶
- Open Package Overview for the shortest statement of the package role.
- Open Ownership Boundary when the question is whether a change belongs here or in a neighbor.
- Open Scope and Non-Goals when a proposed change risks broadening the package.
- Open Capability Map when you need the concrete work the package is allowed to do.
- Open This Package Does Not Own when a proposal is trying to recast recommendation policy as scientific truth or runtime control.
- Open Workflow Recommendation Challenges when you need the current blinded recommendation record rather than summary language.
- Open Workflow Recommendation Confidence when you need the current counterfactual, overconfidence, underconfidence, and regret surfaces.
Section Pages¶
- Package Overview
- Scope and Non-Goals
- Ownership Boundary
- This Package Does Not Own
- Capability Map
- Workflow Recommendation Challenges
- Workflow Recommendation Confidence
- Dependencies and Adjacencies
- Repository Fit
- Lifecycle Overview
- Domain Language
- Change Principles
What This Section Settles¶
- when a rule is a judgment policy rather than a knowledge claim
- which recommendation behavior belongs here before runtime or lab acts on it
- when a proposed change is really about evidence truth or workflow rules and should leave this package
Reader Questions This Section Can Answer Well¶
- why one workflow family still stops at a downgrade even when its benchmark packet looks strong
- which hidden evidence pattern would make the current recommendation regretful
- where overconfidence is already measurable instead of only suspected
- how recommendation pressure differs from scientific truth and downstream lab consequence
Strongest Intelligence Proof¶
- start with Workflow Recommendation Challenges when the dispute is whether recommendation posture survives blinded pressure
- continue to Workflow Recommendation Confidence when the question is where confidence, regret, and counterfactual weakness still remain
- open This Package Does Not Own when someone is trying to rename scientific truth or runtime control as intelligence policy
First Proof Check¶
packages/bijux-proteomics-intelligence/src/bijux_proteomics_intelligencepackages/bijux-proteomics-intelligence/tests- neighboring handbooks once the change crosses the local boundary
Neighbors¶
- Open bijux-proteomics-knowledge when the question leaves scoring, ranking, scenarios, and explanations.
- Open bijux-proteomics-core when the issue is clearly outside this package's local role.