Operations¶
bijux-proteomics-intelligence operations is about changing judgment without
making it arbitrary. Maintainers here are not just shipping code. They are
shipping policy behavior, recommendation quality, and explanation patterns that
people may use to decide what gets advanced, redesigned, or paused.
flowchart LR
policy["policy or evaluator change"]
scenarios["rerun scenario and ranking tests"]
explain["check explanation and brief quality"]
drift["inspect portfolio and design-loop drift"]
review["review recommendation consequences"]
release["publish updated judgment surface"]
policy --> scenarios --> explain --> drift --> review --> release
What Operations Means Here¶
- recommendation drift is an operational concern, not just a modeling concern
- a passing test suite is incomplete if explanations become harder to trust
- maintainers need to reason about output quality across scenarios, not only single-function correctness
Start With¶
- open Common Workflows when you need the standard path from policy edit to trustworthy release
- open Observability and Diagnostics when rankings, briefings, or scenario outputs no longer look believable
- open Failure Recovery when recommendation behavior already regressed in a way humans can see
- open Release and Versioning before publishing any change that alters policy defaults or explanation shape
Route From Operating Concern¶
- Local Development and Installation and Setup for reproducible scoring and evaluation work
- Deployment Boundaries and Security and Safety for the limits that stop recommendation logic from becoming hidden authority
- Performance and Scaling when evaluation volume, portfolio breadth, or report generation cost becomes the practical bottleneck
First Proof Check¶
src/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/policies.pyandevaluators.pysrc/bijux_proteomics_intelligence/report/andoutcomes.pypackages/bijux-proteomics-intelligence/tests