Quality

bijux-proteomics-core quality should tell a reviewer what must remain true, what proof is required, and which risks are serious enough to block a change.

Trust Model

flowchart LR
    invariants["invariants"]
    tests["test strategy"]
    validation["change validation"]
    risks["risk register and limitations"]
    decision["trust or block the change"]

    invariants --> tests --> validation --> risks --> decision

This page should show core quality as contract defense, not general confidence. The package stays trustworthy when program, target, and lifecycle meaning remain explicit enough for downstream packages to build on safely.

Start With

• open Invariants before changing package meaning
• open Change Validation when you need the minimum proof for a real edit
• open Risk Register when the package boundary feels under pressure

Section Pages

• Invariants
• Test Strategy
• Change Validation
• Definition of Done
• Dependency Governance
• Documentation Standards
• Known Limitations
• Review Checklist
• Risk Register

What Quality Means Here

• proving that durable program and lifecycle contracts stay explicit, stable, and downstream-safe

First Proof Check

• packages/bijux-proteomics-core/tests
• src/bijux_proteomics/program_spec.py and targets.py
• src/bijux_proteomics/lifecycle.py and validation.py

Design Pressure

Core quality weakens when implementation changes are easier to describe than the contract they move. The section has to keep durable semantics and proof in the same line of sight.