Bijux Pollenomics

bijux-pollenomics publishes public evidence surfaces about Nordic pollenomics, environmental context, archaeology, boundaries, fieldwork, and ancient-DNA recovery. This site explains what the repository publishes today, what those outputs can answer, and where the limits still are before you lean on a report, ranking, or map view.

Maintainer-only notes stay under docs/internal/ and are not part of the public website navigation.

Start Here

Open the product guide Open the data guide Open the report portal How to read the report tree Open the atlas guide Open the fieldwork record

If you are new to the project, read the site in this order:

flowchart TB
    pollen["pollen and environmental source families"]
    context["archaeology, boundary, and fieldwork context"]
    samples["sample-backed ancient DNA context"]
    reports["country bundles and atlas evidence tables"]
    atlas["visible atlas point or country surface"]
    review["traceability and limits stay visible"]

    pollen --> reports
    context --> reports
    samples --> reports
    reports --> atlas
    atlas --> review

What Is Strong Today

• the repository already publishes tracked pollen, archaeology, boundary, and fieldwork context as reviewable files plus public report surfaces
• world, Europe-plus, Nordic, and country bundles are one publication family, not disconnected products
• the Sweden lake ranking packet and optional Nordic lake overlays now make lake prioritization visible without hiding the underlying evidence packet

What Is Still Constrained

• animal aDNA extraction and the strongest claims that depend on deeper sample recovery remain less mature than the rest of the repository
• visible map proximity still does not substitute for chronology review, source posture, or field verification
• lake ranking surfaces are decision-support outputs, not bathymetry or coring plans

Choose A Route

• use the product guide when you need the overall answer: what the repository is for and how the outputs fit together
• use the data guide when you need the evidence answer: what is in scope, how it is governed, and what remains weak
• use the report portal when you want the checked-in public outputs first
• use the Nordic atlas guide when you need map behavior, filters, point posture, and overlay caveats
• use the fieldwork record when you want one real visited location instead of a generalized public summary

These routes are written for readers first. You should be able to understand what the repository publishes, why a map or ranking exists, and where the limits still are without reading the source tree first.

Fieldwork Record

The fieldwork section is intentionally narrow. It anchors one mapped point to a real visit without pretending that field media replaces curated sample, paper, or supplement evidence.

Open the fieldwork page Open the field video

Lyngsjön Lake, southwest of Kristianstad, during winter field collection on 2026-02-26.

What The Repository Does Not Claim

• that map proximity alone establishes scientific weight
• that every visible layer has identical provenance quality
• that a project list alone is enough to justify a mapped point
• that unresolved or region-only geography should be published like exact site evidence
• that the current narrow animal aDNA atlas candidate surface means the repository is already scientifically broad
• that the repository is already the full cross-evidence pollenomics engine

Read By Question

• what the runtime rebuilds: product guide
• what this repository publishes and where its limits are: documentation home
• what the tracked data system and source families are: data guide
• how the publication tree is organized: report portal
• how the map points, filters, and honesty surfaces work: Nordic atlas guide