Bijux Pollenomics¶
bijux-pollenomics is a checked-in Nordic evidence workspace. The repository
collects source-backed records, normalizes them into tracked files, and
publishes those files as country bundles plus one shared atlas that readers can
inspect directly.
Right now the honest description is atlas-builder first. This repository publishes a reproducible evidence surface and can now emit heuristic candidate site outputs from that surface, but it is not yet the broader pollenomics analysis engine that combines aDNA, eDNA, pollen, and archaeological context in one scientific workflow.
The atlas is the fastest honest route into the repository. It shows what is actually published today: AADR sample points, LandClim pollen sequences and REVEALS grid cells, Neotoma pollen sites, SEAD sites, Swedish archaeology density from RAÄ, fieldwork media, and Nordic country boundaries.
Evidence Flow¶
flowchart TB
sources["upstream evidence families"]
runtime["runtime collect and normalize loop"]
tree["tracked data tree"]
reports["country report bundles"]
atlas["nordic evidence atlas"]
fieldwork["lyngsjon visit media"]
maintainers["repository health checks"]
reader["reader asks what is supportable"]
sources --> runtime
runtime --> tree
tree --> reports
tree --> atlas
fieldwork --> atlas
maintainers --> runtime
reports --> reader
atlas --> reader
Read the site as a chain of evidence, not as a table of contents. A visible map layer starts in an upstream family, becomes reviewable only after it lands in the tracked data tree, and becomes public through a report or atlas bundle. The fieldwork media is intentionally narrow: it gives one mapped point a direct visit record without pretending to cover the whole Nordic evidence landscape.
The landing page should make one thing immediately clear: visible atlas layers, country reports, and tracked files are different proof surfaces in one chain. If that chain feels decorative instead of operational, readers will assume the site is presentation first and evidence second.
Start Here¶
Open the route that matches the real question:
- visible map, layer, point, or polygon: open the Nordic Evidence Atlas
- runtime commands, rebuild logic, package boundaries, or tests: open bijux-pollenomics
- source provenance, normalized file families, or publication bundles: open bijux-pollenomics-data
- release, docs, CI, or shared command routing: open bijux-pollenomics-maintain
Fieldwork Record¶
The repository also carries checked-in field media from the Lyngsjön Lake sampling visit on 2026-02-26. That material anchors one atlas point to a real collection day on the lake ice rather than to a database row alone.
What This Repository Publishes¶
- one shared Nordic atlas under
docs/report/nordic-atlas/ - one checked-in country report bundle for each published country under
docs/report/ - tracked normalized evidence files under
data/ - one runtime package that rebuilds those outputs from stable commands
- one narrow fieldwork record that ties a mapped point to a real visit
What Comes Next¶
The next repository step is not to make the atlas prettier. It is to make the evidence loop stronger: candidate ranking must stay traceable to tracked layers, multi-evidence workflows must remain explicit about provenance, and the future pollenomics engine must grow from this checked-in evidence base rather than bypass it.
What This Repository Does Not Claim¶
- that map proximity alone establishes scientific weight
- that every visible layer has identical provenance quality
- that mutable upstream services will always replay identically
- that one field visit stands in for regional evidence coverage
Package Handbooks¶
First Proof Check¶
docs/report/nordic-atlas/nordic-atlas_map.htmlfor the visible publication surface most readers will inspect firstdata/for the tracked normalized evidence tree that feeds the atlaspackages/bijux-pollenomics/src/bijux_pollenomics/for the runtime code that collects, normalizes, and publishespackages/bijux-pollenomics-dev/src/bijux_pollenomics_dev/andmakes/for the repository-health surfaces that protect release, docs, and verification
Boundary Test¶
If a claim about the atlas cannot be backed by tracked source provenance, runtime contracts, checked-in outputs, or maintainer proof, this site should state that limit directly instead of implying certainty it does not have.