Skip to content

Benchmark Assets

This route starts at public source identity and ends at the benchmark packages the repository currently asks outsiders to inspect first.

The benchmark surface is no longer a thin example-data story. It is the public scientific evidence root for flagship workflow language: source identity, package manifests, lineage, freshness review, incompleteness notes, licensing limits, and paired-package transfer pressure.

What The Benchmark Surface Must Prove

A flagship benchmark package has to do more than contain files:

  • identify the public source and its scientific role
  • document how the packaged assets were selected and rebuilt
  • expose enough evidence for an outsider to challenge the family sentence
  • sit beside a companion pressure package so one convenient showcase does not dominate the release call

If the package is broad-looking but easy, stale, or isolated, it does not earn flagship language.

What Ships Here

  • flagship public benchmark packages under benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages
  • source and citation manifests, generated boundaries, and rebuild instructions
  • freshness, obsolescence, incompleteness, and licensing review surfaces
  • family-specific lineage pages that explain why each current family sentence survives or narrows

Benchmark Asset Classes

asset class what it gives reviewers why it matters
flagship public packages primary outsider-readable evidence roots the public sentence starts from real shipped materials
companion pressure packages harder or narrowing comparison routes one convenient benchmark cannot carry the whole release story
source identity and citation manifests provenance and scientific role reviewers can see what was packaged and why
rebuild and generated-boundary instructions reproducibility discipline benchmark packets stay inspectable rather than archival curiosities
freshness and incompleteness ledgers evidence quality limits weak or aging packets narrow public language at the evidence root
licensing and redistribution review allowed public use readers can trust that the benchmark surface is shippable, not only informative

Family Coverage

family benchmark strength today key benchmark limiter lineage page
dda strong public package pair strongest packet still routes into an import-backed runtime lane DDA Benchmark Lineage
dia strong public package pair library incompleteness still narrows broader transfer language DIA Benchmark Lineage
lfq strong public package pair cohort and missingness pressure still narrow broader public language LFQ Benchmark Lineage
multiplex real public package pair current stress packet still collapses outsider-facing trust Multiplex Benchmark Lineage
ptm strong public package pair localization evidence still outruns downstream consequence confidence PTM Benchmark Lineage
targeted strong public package pair calibration and interference still narrow broader certainty Targeted Benchmark Lineage

Why This Route Matters More Now

The repository now has enough real scientific depth that evidence-root quality has become a first-order product question:

  • broader sequence, chemistry, spectra, mzML, DIA, PTM, and quantification surfaces mean benchmark packages are no longer only fixtures
  • paired benchmark logic means one easy flagship packet cannot carry the whole public sentence alone
  • incompleteness, freshness drift, and licensing limits are now part of the public evidence story rather than maintainer-only context

What A Skeptical Reader Should Check

  • does the family have both a flagship package and a companion pressure route
  • does the package expose enough source identity and rebuild detail to be reviewable
  • do incompleteness and transfer limits appear at the evidence root instead of being postponed into later recommendation prose
  • does the lineage page explain why the family sentence narrows where it does

What Changed Since v0.3.7

  • benchmark surfaces are now one of the clearest public proofs that the repository contains more than governance
  • family-specific lineage, freshness, incompleteness, and licensing pages now make benchmark quality part of the public release argument
  • paired flagship and pressure packages now keep stronger workflow families honest by forcing easier and harder evidence roots to coexist

Best Next Routes

Boundary

This route should answer where the public scientific evidence starts and how complete it is. It should hand off before pretending that benchmark lineage alone settles runtime trust, recommendation strength, or lab consequence.