Why Multiplex Stops At Internal Support¶
Internal Support Only¶
multiplex has real scientific and Runtime evidence, but it is not an
outsider-auditable flagship family. Its current transfer and consequence chain
does not support that stronger public posture.
flowchart LR
P["primary TMTpro package"] --> R["raw-executable Runtime lane"]
S["channel-stress package"] --> T["cross-package transfer"]
R --> T
T -->|fragile_transfer| B["internal support ceiling"]
D["outsider decision brief missing"] --> B
O["requested-versus-observed dossier missing"] --> B
A["assay-worth-it row missing"] --> B
Evidence Already Present¶
| Surface | Current evidence | What it establishes |
|---|---|---|
| primary package | multiplex_tmtpro_review_package |
channel balance, ratio compression, and missing-channel review |
| stress package | multiplex_channel_stress_review_package |
harsher channel and transfer pressure |
| Runtime | multiplex-tmtpro-review-corpus in raw_executable mode |
repository execution from the checked input level |
| transfer report | multiplex_channel_stress_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json |
current cross-package result is fragile_transfer |
raw_executable does not mean vendor-native acquisition replay, stable family
transfer, outsider review closure, or laboratory value. Those are separate
evidence bars.
Missing Trust Links¶
- a dedicated outsider decision brief with explicit policy and refusal;
- a requested-versus-observed outcome dossier;
- an assay-worth-it ledger row connecting benefit, burden, controls, and outcome;
- transfer evidence strong enough to replace
fragile_transferwith a defensible bounded result.
Because these links are absent, Multiplex has not earned outsider-auditable flagship family status, lab-consequential authority, or language borrowed from the DDA, DIA, LFQ, PTM, or targeted trust pages.
Promotion Rule¶
Promotion requires all missing links to close together. A second benchmark package alone is insufficient; a green Runtime rerun alone is insufficient; and a polished review narrative is insufficient. The generated workflow claim limits, transfer result, outsider packet, and Lab consequence evidence must agree on the same bounded sentence.
Evidence Grounding¶
- Workflow Claim Grounding tests whether each sentence retains source support.
- Workflow Literature Audits exposes citation freshness and unresolved gaps.
- Workflow Consequence Maps shows the downstream evidence required before internal support can widen.