Compatibility Commitments¶

Compatibility commitments for bijux-canon-ingest define how changes to prepared ingest behavior are supposed to be reviewed and announced. Stability language is only credible when the breakage process is explicit too.

What To Check¶

name which surfaces carry real compatibility pressure
tie breaking changes to docs, changelog, versioning, and validation together
treat vague stability claims as weaker than clear limits and explicit break rules

First Proof Check¶

src and boundary-facing modules for the owning implementation surface
apis/bijux-canon-ingest/v1/schema.yaml or tracked examples for the documented contract surface
tests for executable confirmation that the contract still holds

Bottom Line¶

If callers depend on bijux-canon-ingest for prepared ingest behavior, the contract needs to be named as clearly as the implementation.