Skip to content

Common Workflows

Common workflows should show the recurring paths maintainers actually follow when changing or re-running bijux-canon-ingest. If a recurring path is still reconstructed from memory, the runbook is incomplete.

What To Check

  • name the repeatable path from entrypoint to owned code to proof
  • separate the common path from special-case debugging or one-off repair work
  • treat repeated oral instructions as a sign that the workflow still is not documented tightly enough

First Proof Check

  • pyproject.toml, README.md, and boundary-facing entrypoints for checked-in operating truth
  • tests and runnable workflows for executable confirmation that the runbook still works
  • release notes and version metadata when the work changes caller expectations

Bottom Line

If bijux-canon-ingest cannot be operated repeatably under change, the operational documentation is still incomplete.