Observability and Diagnostics¶

Diagnostics should make it easier to explain what bijux-canon-index did, not merely that it ran.

Good diagnostics shorten both incidents and reviews. They give maintainers a way to connect visible outputs back to the package behavior that produced them.

Treat the operations pages for bijux-canon-index as the package's explicit operating memory. They should make common tasks repeatable without relearning the workflow from logs or oral history.

Visual Summary¶

graph TD
    A[Observability and Diagnostics] --> B[Collect logs and metrics]
    B --> C[Correlate with index run]
    C --> D[Diagnose failure or slowdown]
    D --> E[Apply targeted fix]
    E --> F[Verify improvement]

Diagnostic Anchors¶

vector execution result collections
provenance and replay comparison reports
backend-specific metadata and audit output

Supporting Modules¶

src/bijux_canon_index/domain for execution, provenance, and request semantics
src/bijux_canon_index/application for workflow coordination

Concrete Anchors¶

packages/bijux-canon-index/pyproject.toml for package metadata
packages/bijux-canon-index/README.md for local package framing
packages/bijux-canon-index/tests for executable operational backstops

Use This Page When¶

you are installing, running, diagnosing, or releasing the package
you need repeatable operational anchors rather than architectural framing
you are responding to package behavior in local work, CI, or incident pressure

Decision Rule¶

Use Observability and Diagnostics to decide whether a maintainer can repeat the package workflow from checked-in assets instead of memory. If a step works only because someone already knows the trick, the workflow is not documented clearly enough yet.

What This Page Answers¶

how bijux-canon-index is installed, run, diagnosed, and released in practice
which checked-in files and tests anchor the operational story
where a maintainer should look first when the package behaves differently

Reviewer Lens¶

verify that setup, workflow, and release statements still match package metadata and current commands
check that operational guidance still points at real diagnostics and validation paths
confirm that maintainer advice still works under current local and CI expectations

Honesty Boundary¶

This page explains how bijux-canon-index is expected to be operated, but it does not replace package metadata, actual runtime behavior, or validation in a real environment. A workflow is only trustworthy if a maintainer can still repeat it from the checked-in assets named here.

Next Checks¶

move to interfaces when the operational path depends on a specific surface contract
move to quality when the question becomes whether the workflow is sufficiently proven
move back to architecture when operational complexity suggests a structural problem

Purpose¶

This page points readers toward the package's observable output and diagnostic support.

Stability¶

Keep it aligned with the package modules and artifacts that currently support diagnosis.