Operations¶
The operations section covers the shared procedures that keep the package split credible after code changes: local workflow, validation, schema review, artifact handling, release flow, and review discipline.
The main mistake this section should prevent is operational folklore. Shared work should be discoverable from checked-in commands, workflows, schemas, and docs instead of from CI archaeology or private maintainer memory.
Operating Loop¶
Operations pages should make the shared work loop visible: a contributor changes a package or root contract, runs the relevant local command, leaves artifacts in the repository-owned output area, and lets CI repeat the same intent before release.
flowchart LR
change["change intent"]
local["local make and package checks"]
artifacts["artifacts output"]
review["review gate"]
ci["CI and release workflows"]
publish["published result"]
apis["apis contracts"]
workflows["workflow source"]
change --> local --> artifacts --> review --> ci --> publish
change --> apis
ci --> workflows
Repository operations should read like a closed loop, not like a bag of
commands. A maintainer starts from one explicit change, runs the checked-in
entrypoints, leaves machine output in artifacts/, and relies on review and
CI to replay the same intent. If a step cannot be traced to one of those
surfaces, it is operational folklore rather than repository procedure.
Start Here¶
- open Contributor Workflows for the shortest route through normal repository work
- open Testing and Validation when you need to know which shared proof must run before acceptance
- open API and Schema Governance when the concern is contract drift or reviewed schema change
- open Release and Versioning when the concern is tag behavior, package publication, or release discipline
- open Automation Surfaces when you need to know which shared root automation owns the current action
Pages In This Section¶
- Local Development
- Testing and Validation
- Release and Versioning
- API and Schema Governance
- Contributor Workflows
- Automation Surfaces
- Artifact Governance
- Review Expectations
- Change Management
First Proof Checks¶
Makefileandmakes/for shared command entrypoints and routing.github/workflows/for repository-wide automation and release executionapis/for schema governance surfaces that affect shared review- the relevant package handbook once the action stops being truly shared
Leave This Section When¶
- the work is already local to one package's own operations surface
- the real question is repository intent rather than repository procedure
- the next step is maintainer-helper implementation detail instead of the shared workflow contract