Skip to content

Installation and Setup

Installation for bijux-canon-ingest should start from the package metadata and the specific optional dependencies that matter for the work being done.

This page exists to keep setup honest. A maintainer should be able to tell which files actually define installation truth and which dependencies are merely present in the environment for unrelated reasons.

Treat the operations pages for bijux-canon-ingest as the package's explicit operating memory. They should make common tasks repeatable without relearning the workflow from logs or oral history.

Visual Summary

graph TD
    A[Installation and Setup] --> B[Prepare environment]
    B --> C[Install dependencies]
    C --> D[Configure ingest runtime]
    D --> E[Run smoke checks]
    E --> F[Ready for development]

Package Metadata Anchors

  • package root: packages/bijux-canon-ingest
  • metadata file: packages/bijux-canon-ingest/pyproject.toml
  • readme: packages/bijux-canon-ingest/README.md

Dependency Themes

  • pydantic
  • msgpack
  • numpy
  • fastapi
  • uvicorn
  • PyYAML

Concrete Anchors

  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/pyproject.toml for package metadata
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/README.md for local package framing
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/tests for executable operational backstops

Use This Page When

  • you are installing, running, diagnosing, or releasing the package
  • you need repeatable operational anchors rather than architectural framing
  • you are responding to package behavior in local work, CI, or incident pressure

Decision Rule

Use Installation and Setup to decide whether a maintainer can repeat the package workflow from checked-in assets instead of memory. If a step works only because someone already knows the trick, the workflow is not documented clearly enough yet.

What This Page Answers

  • how bijux-canon-ingest is installed, run, diagnosed, and released in practice
  • which checked-in files and tests anchor the operational story
  • where a maintainer should look first when the package behaves differently

Reviewer Lens

  • verify that setup, workflow, and release statements still match package metadata and current commands
  • check that operational guidance still points at real diagnostics and validation paths
  • confirm that maintainer advice still works under current local and CI expectations

Honesty Boundary

This page explains how bijux-canon-ingest is expected to be operated, but it does not replace package metadata, actual runtime behavior, or validation in a real environment. A workflow is only trustworthy if a maintainer can still repeat it from the checked-in assets named here.

Next Checks

  • move to interfaces when the operational path depends on a specific surface contract
  • move to quality when the question becomes whether the workflow is sufficiently proven
  • move back to architecture when operational complexity suggests a structural problem

Purpose

This page tells maintainers where setup truth actually lives for the package.

Stability

Keep it aligned with pyproject.toml and the checked-in package metadata.