Skip to content

Ingest Handbook

bijux-canon-ingest owns deterministic document preparation, chunking, and retrieval-ready shaping. It is the package that turns raw source material into stable inputs the rest of the system can trust.

The main failure this handbook prevents is treating ingest like a convenient place for every upstream cleanup, retrieval tweak, or workflow shortcut. Ingest should only grow when the change makes prepared source material more predictable, not when another package wants to offload its own complexity.

What The Reader Should See First

Ingest is the preparation gate. It takes source material that may be noisy, partial, duplicated, or inconsistently shaped and produces material that later packages can treat as intentional input. The value is not that ingest does everything near documents. The value is that it stops uncertainty from leaking into retrieval, reasoning, and runtime review.

flowchart LR
    source["source material"]
    config["ingest configuration"]
    processing["processing pipeline"]
    retrieval["retrieval-ready records"]
    tests["tests and invariants"]
    interfaces["caller surfaces"]
    downstream["downstream packages"]

    source --> config --> processing --> retrieval --> downstream
    processing --> tests
    retrieval --> interfaces

Readers should come away with one clear picture: ingest is where messy source material stops being tolerated as-is. The package earns its place by making preparation reproducible enough that every later package can assume the input was shaped on purpose rather than by accident.

What This Package Owns

  • document cleaning, normalization, and chunking before retrieval
  • ingest-side records and artifacts that downstream packages accept as prepared input
  • deterministic preparation workflows that remove source ambiguity before indexing

What This Package Does Not Own

  • vector execution, retrieval replay, and backend index behavior
  • claim formation, reasoning policy, or multi-step orchestration semantics
  • runtime acceptance, persistence, and governed replay authority

Boundary Test

If the question is still about making source material predictable before any vector store or reasoning step touches it, it belongs here. If the question starts with retrieval quality, claim behavior, agent coordination, or run acceptance, it belongs somewhere else.

First Proof Check

  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/src/bijux_canon_ingest/processing for deterministic preparation logic
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/src/bijux_canon_ingest/retrieval for retrieval-ready records and assembly owned before index handoff
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/src/bijux_canon_ingest/interfaces for CLI, HTTP, serialization, and caller-facing boundaries
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/tests for the proof that prepared output stays stable under change

Start Here

  • open Foundation when the question is why this package exists or where its ownership stops
  • open Architecture when you need module boundaries, dependency flow, or execution shape
  • open Interfaces when the question is about commands, APIs, schemas, imports, or artifacts that callers may treat as stable
  • open Operations when you need local workflow, diagnostics, release, or recovery guidance
  • open Quality when the question is whether the package has proved its promises strongly enough

Pages In This Package

Leave This Handbook When

  • the question is now about retrieval execution rather than preparation
  • the next stop is a concrete caller contract, workflow, or test surface
  • the behavior is really owned by reasoning, orchestration, or runtime