Operator Workflows¶
Operator workflows matter when bijux-canon-runtime is run by humans or automation under real expectations. The workflow should show one supported operator path from entrypoint to reviewable output.
What To Check¶
- name the supported operator path rather than every possible internal path
- identify the output or artifact the operator should inspect at the end
- treat undocumented manual steps as evidence that the workflow is not yet a real surface
First Proof Check¶
srcand boundary-facing modules for the owning implementation surfaceapis/bijux-canon-runtime/v1/schema.yamlor tracked examples for the documented contract surfacetestsfor executable confirmation that the contract still holds
Bottom Line¶
If callers depend on bijux-canon-runtime for runtime authority surfaces, the contract needs to be named as clearly as the implementation.