Catalog¶
The catalog is the concrete half of the compatibility handbook. It tells you which compatibility names still ship, what they preserve, and which canonical package now owns the real behavior.
These pages should be quick to scan and hard to misread. A reader should be able to land on an old name, find the current target immediately, and tell whether the compatibility layer is still thin enough to justify itself.
Catalog Model¶
flowchart LR
legacy["legacy package or surface"]
catalog["catalog page"]
target["canonical target"]
proof["checked preserved behavior"]
pressure["retire when the bridge is no longer needed"]
legacy --> catalog --> target
catalog --> proof
pressure --> catalog
The catalog only works when it answers the first practical question fast: what does this old name still point to now? After that, the page has to make the remaining bridge visible enough that readers can judge whether the compatibility surface is still honest or just lingering.
Catalog Pages¶
- bijux-canon
- agentic-flows
- bijux-agent
- bijux-rag
- bijux-rar
- bijux-vex
- Legacy Name Map
- Package Behavior
- Import Surfaces
- Command Surfaces
Start With¶
- Open an individual package page when you already know the legacy package name.
- Open Legacy Name Map for the full bridge table.
- Open Import Surfaces or Command Surfaces when the compatibility risk is one public surface rather than one package.
Checked Surfaces¶
- preserved compatibility distribution names on PyPI
- preserved Python import roots
- preserved CLI names where they still exist
- compatibility package metadata and README routing
Boundary¶
The catalog identifies what still exists. It does not justify keeping those surfaces forever. Retirement and continuity decisions belong in the migration section.
Design Pressure¶
If a catalog page hides the canonical target, the preserved behavior, or the remaining migration cost, the compatibility layer starts looking permanent. This section has to stay closer to a ledger than a landing page.