Skip to content

Observability and Diagnostics

Diagnostics should make it easier to explain what bijux-canon-ingest did, not merely that it ran.

Good diagnostics shorten both incidents and reviews. They give maintainers a way to connect visible outputs back to the package behavior that produced them.

Treat the operations pages for bijux-canon-ingest as the package's explicit operating memory. They should make common tasks repeatable without relearning the workflow from logs or oral history.

Visual Summary

graph TD
    A[Observability and Diagnostics] --> B[Collect logs and metrics]
    B --> C[Correlate with ingest run]
    C --> D[Diagnose failure or slowdown]
    D --> E[Apply targeted fix]
    E --> F[Verify improvement]

Diagnostic Anchors

  • normalized document trees
  • chunk collections and retrieval-ready records
  • diagnostic output produced during ingest workflows

Supporting Modules

  • src/bijux_canon_ingest/processing for deterministic document transforms
  • src/bijux_canon_ingest/retrieval for retrieval-oriented models and assembly

Concrete Anchors

  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/pyproject.toml for package metadata
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/README.md for local package framing
  • packages/bijux-canon-ingest/tests for executable operational backstops

Use This Page When

  • you are installing, running, diagnosing, or releasing the package
  • you need repeatable operational anchors rather than architectural framing
  • you are responding to package behavior in local work, CI, or incident pressure

Decision Rule

Use Observability and Diagnostics to decide whether a maintainer can repeat the package workflow from checked-in assets instead of memory. If a step works only because someone already knows the trick, the workflow is not documented clearly enough yet.

What This Page Answers

  • how bijux-canon-ingest is installed, run, diagnosed, and released in practice
  • which checked-in files and tests anchor the operational story
  • where a maintainer should look first when the package behaves differently

Reviewer Lens

  • verify that setup, workflow, and release statements still match package metadata and current commands
  • check that operational guidance still points at real diagnostics and validation paths
  • confirm that maintainer advice still works under current local and CI expectations

Honesty Boundary

This page explains how bijux-canon-ingest is expected to be operated, but it does not replace package metadata, actual runtime behavior, or validation in a real environment. A workflow is only trustworthy if a maintainer can still repeat it from the checked-in assets named here.

Next Checks

  • move to interfaces when the operational path depends on a specific surface contract
  • move to quality when the question becomes whether the workflow is sufficiently proven
  • move back to architecture when operational complexity suggests a structural problem

Purpose

This page points readers toward the package's observable output and diagnostic support.

Stability

Keep it aligned with the package modules and artifacts that currently support diagnosis.