Quality¶

Open this section when you need to decide whether prepared ingest output is trustworthy enough for downstream packages to build on without inheriting hidden drift.

Trust Model¶

flowchart LR
    strategy["test strategy"]
    invariants["ingest invariants"]
    validation["change validation"]
    limits["limitations and risk"]
    trust["trust decision"]

    strategy --> invariants --> validation --> limits --> trust

Quality pages should tell a reviewer why prepared ingest output deserves to be trusted by later packages. Tests matter, but only when they are connected to the invariants that keep source preparation stable and to the limits that still need to be read honestly.

Read These First¶

open Test Strategy first when you need the broad proof shape behind ingest behavior
open Invariants when the question is what must not drift across source preparation and chunking
open Change Validation when you need the minimum proof for a safe ingest change

Trust Risk¶

The main quality risk here is letting unstable prepared input look healthy because later packages still pass on top of it.

First Proof Check¶

tests and package-local validation surfaces for executable evidence
invariants, limitations, and risk pages for the trust boundaries that still matter after green checks
release notes and caller-facing docs when the change alters what readers may safely assume

Pages In This Section¶

Leave This Section When¶

leave for Foundation when the doubt is really about package ownership rather than proof
leave for Interfaces when the question is what the contract is rather than whether it is defended
leave for Operations when the package already seems trustworthy and the real issue is how to run it repeatably

Design Pressure¶

If quality here is reduced to green checks alone, unstable prepared input can still leak forward. This section has to tie proofs, invariants, and residual limits into one trust story.