Workflow Claim Limits¶
This page is the release-facing claim-limit source of truth for the flagship workflow families.
Outsider-auditable workflow families today: dda, dia, ptm, targeted.
Released outsider-auditable workflow families today: dda, dia, ptm, targeted.
Internal-support-only workflow families today: multiplex.
Full outsider-readable family packets today: dda, dia, lfq, ptm, targeted.
Family-level trust now requires two public benchmark packages plus one
published cross-package generalization report. The current scorecard lives at
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/family_stability_scorecard.json.
What changed since v0.3.7 is not only wording. The matrix now sits on a
deeper chain of proof: broader core scientific surfaces, clearer runtime
rerun lanes, explicit knowledge grounding, recommendation posture, and visible
lab consequence pressure. That means the repository can now distinguish between
families that have a full outsider-readable packet and families whose released
sentence must still stay narrower.
The point of this matrix is to keep that stronger depth from being flattened into one generic trust label. A family can now have meaningful benchmark, runtime, grounding, recommendation, and consequence surfaces while still stopping short of the broadest released sentence.
What This Matrix Governs¶
- what the repository can publicly say today for each workflow family
- which family has a full benchmark, runtime, grounding, recommendation, and consequence packet
- which family still narrows at the released sentence because one part of that packet remains downgrade-heavy
- which family stops at internal support even though code, runtime, and public benchmark substance exist
The distinction that matters most now is this:
outsider-auditableis the stronger release-language setfull outsider-readable family packetsis the wider proof-packet set- LFQ currently belongs to the second set but not the first
Why This Distinction Matters¶
- it keeps the repository from flattening all strong-looking family packets into one trust label
- it explains why a public packet can be openable and still remain narrowed at release time
- it makes clear that consequence and burden surfaces can still veto broader family language
Current Limits¶
| Workflow | Internal benchmark-backed | Raw-executable | Externally cross-checked | Outsider-auditable | Lab-consequential | Public language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dda |
yes | no | yes | yes | yes | bounded outsider-auditable |
dia |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | bounded outsider-auditable |
lfq |
yes | yes | yes | no | yes | review-grade bounded |
multiplex |
yes | yes | no | no | no | internal support only |
ptm |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | bounded outsider-auditable |
targeted |
yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | bounded outsider-auditable |
How To Read This¶
internal benchmark-backedmeans a tracked flagship public package exists underbenchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/raw-executablemeans the strongest current runtime lane runs the tracked package directly instead of stopping at an import-only bridgeexternally cross-checkedmeans public comparator posture is at least advisory rather than refusedoutsider-auditablemeans the benchmark package, runtime lane, scientific reading, recommendation packet, planned lab packet, requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and the family generalization report can be opened together by a skeptical reviewerreview-grade boundedmeans the benchmark, runtime, and review surfaces stay usable, but the current external review kit or acceptance pressure still narrows the stronger outsider-facing sentencelab-consequentialmeans a dedicated flagship lab packet, one shipped requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and one assay-worth-it ledger row all exist together
What Outsider-Auditable Still Refuses¶
- it does not mean universal transfer across cohorts, instruments, study designs, or vendor-conditioned execution paths
- it does not mean the runtime lane is equally strong for every family
- it does not mean the strongest analytical sentence automatically becomes a stronger lab consequence sentence
What Review-Grade Bounded Still Means¶
- the family is real enough to inspect through benchmark, runtime, grounding, and recommendation surfaces
- the family is not weak or fake; it is explicitly narrowed by visible pressure that still survives challenge
- the narrower released sentence is part of the product honesty, not a contradiction in the docs
The current lab-consequence evidence is still benchmark-simulated rather than live wet-lab release proof. It earns bounded consequence language because the requested-versus-observed loop is now explicit, not because the repository has already closed real laboratory deployment risk.
Why LFQ Still Narrows At Release Time¶
- LFQ now has a full outsider-auditable packet in the narrow sense: public benchmark packages, runtime lane, grounding route, recommendation posture, requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and assay-worth-it ledger row
- the released sentence still remains review-grade bounded because missingness, normalization pressure, and sparse-cohort transfer risk remain visible in its own external review and acceptance surfaces
- this is intentional honesty rather than inconsistency: the packet is public, and the narrowing pressure is public too
Why This Matrix Matters More Now¶
- the repository can now show several family packets with real outsider-facing review substance, so the release boundary has to be explicit instead of implied
- stronger public benchmark and rerun surfaces make overclaiming easier unless one page still names the narrower sentence exactly
- consequence pressure now matters enough that a family can look analytically strong and still need a weaker released sentence
Reader Use¶
- use this page when one trust page sounds strong and you need the release boundary in one place
- use it to distinguish family-packet breadth from released family language
- use it before widening workflow language in changelogs, READMEs, or release summaries
Family Transfer Evidence¶
dda- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dda_cross_engine_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dda_cross_engine_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json dia- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dia_matrix_shift_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dia_matrix_shift_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json lfq- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/lfq_sparse_contrast_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/lfq_sparse_contrast_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json multiplex- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/multiplex_channel_stress_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/multiplex_channel_stress_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json ptm- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/ptm_ambiguity_stress_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/ptm_ambiguity_stress_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json targeted- companion package:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/targeted_carryover_review_package - generalization report:
packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/targeted_carryover_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
Boundary¶
This matrix does not grant elite language. It only narrows what each workflow family can honestly claim today.