Skip to content

Workflow Claim Limits

This page is the release-facing claim-limit source of truth for the flagship workflow families.

Outsider-auditable workflow families today: dda, dia, ptm, targeted. Released outsider-auditable workflow families today: dda, dia, ptm, targeted. Internal-support-only workflow families today: multiplex. Full outsider-readable family packets today: dda, dia, lfq, ptm, targeted.

Family-level trust now requires two public benchmark packages plus one published cross-package generalization report. The current scorecard lives at packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/family_stability_scorecard.json.

What changed since v0.3.7 is not only wording. The matrix now sits on a deeper chain of proof: broader core scientific surfaces, clearer runtime rerun lanes, explicit knowledge grounding, recommendation posture, and visible lab consequence pressure. That means the repository can now distinguish between families that have a full outsider-readable packet and families whose released sentence must still stay narrower.

The point of this matrix is to keep that stronger depth from being flattened into one generic trust label. A family can now have meaningful benchmark, runtime, grounding, recommendation, and consequence surfaces while still stopping short of the broadest released sentence.

What This Matrix Governs

  • what the repository can publicly say today for each workflow family
  • which family has a full benchmark, runtime, grounding, recommendation, and consequence packet
  • which family still narrows at the released sentence because one part of that packet remains downgrade-heavy
  • which family stops at internal support even though code, runtime, and public benchmark substance exist

The distinction that matters most now is this:

  • outsider-auditable is the stronger release-language set
  • full outsider-readable family packets is the wider proof-packet set
  • LFQ currently belongs to the second set but not the first

Why This Distinction Matters

  • it keeps the repository from flattening all strong-looking family packets into one trust label
  • it explains why a public packet can be openable and still remain narrowed at release time
  • it makes clear that consequence and burden surfaces can still veto broader family language

Current Limits

Workflow Internal benchmark-backed Raw-executable Externally cross-checked Outsider-auditable Lab-consequential Public language
dda yes no yes yes yes bounded outsider-auditable
dia yes yes yes yes yes bounded outsider-auditable
lfq yes yes yes no yes review-grade bounded
multiplex yes yes no no no internal support only
ptm yes yes yes yes yes bounded outsider-auditable
targeted yes yes yes yes yes bounded outsider-auditable

How To Read This

  • internal benchmark-backed means a tracked flagship public package exists under benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/
  • raw-executable means the strongest current runtime lane runs the tracked package directly instead of stopping at an import-only bridge
  • externally cross-checked means public comparator posture is at least advisory rather than refused
  • outsider-auditable means the benchmark package, runtime lane, scientific reading, recommendation packet, planned lab packet, requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and the family generalization report can be opened together by a skeptical reviewer
  • review-grade bounded means the benchmark, runtime, and review surfaces stay usable, but the current external review kit or acceptance pressure still narrows the stronger outsider-facing sentence
  • lab-consequential means a dedicated flagship lab packet, one shipped requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and one assay-worth-it ledger row all exist together

What Outsider-Auditable Still Refuses

  • it does not mean universal transfer across cohorts, instruments, study designs, or vendor-conditioned execution paths
  • it does not mean the runtime lane is equally strong for every family
  • it does not mean the strongest analytical sentence automatically becomes a stronger lab consequence sentence

What Review-Grade Bounded Still Means

  • the family is real enough to inspect through benchmark, runtime, grounding, and recommendation surfaces
  • the family is not weak or fake; it is explicitly narrowed by visible pressure that still survives challenge
  • the narrower released sentence is part of the product honesty, not a contradiction in the docs

The current lab-consequence evidence is still benchmark-simulated rather than live wet-lab release proof. It earns bounded consequence language because the requested-versus-observed loop is now explicit, not because the repository has already closed real laboratory deployment risk.

Why LFQ Still Narrows At Release Time

  • LFQ now has a full outsider-auditable packet in the narrow sense: public benchmark packages, runtime lane, grounding route, recommendation posture, requested-versus-observed outcome dossier, and assay-worth-it ledger row
  • the released sentence still remains review-grade bounded because missingness, normalization pressure, and sparse-cohort transfer risk remain visible in its own external review and acceptance surfaces
  • this is intentional honesty rather than inconsistency: the packet is public, and the narrowing pressure is public too

Why This Matrix Matters More Now

  • the repository can now show several family packets with real outsider-facing review substance, so the release boundary has to be explicit instead of implied
  • stronger public benchmark and rerun surfaces make overclaiming easier unless one page still names the narrower sentence exactly
  • consequence pressure now matters enough that a family can look analytically strong and still need a weaker released sentence

Reader Use

  • use this page when one trust page sounds strong and you need the release boundary in one place
  • use it to distinguish family-packet breadth from released family language
  • use it before widening workflow language in changelogs, READMEs, or release summaries

Family Transfer Evidence

  • dda
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dda_cross_engine_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dda_cross_engine_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
  • dia
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dia_matrix_shift_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/dia_matrix_shift_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
  • lfq
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/lfq_sparse_contrast_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/lfq_sparse_contrast_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
  • multiplex
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/multiplex_channel_stress_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/multiplex_channel_stress_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
  • ptm
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/ptm_ambiguity_stress_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/ptm_ambiguity_stress_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json
  • targeted
  • companion package: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/targeted_carryover_review_package
  • generalization report: packages/bijux-proteomics-core/benchmark-assets/flagship-public-packages/targeted_carryover_review_package/cross_package_generalization.json

Boundary

This matrix does not grant elite language. It only narrows what each workflow family can honestly claim today.