Skip to content

Repository credibility dashboard

  • Overall posture: credible_but_still_recovery_bound
  • Average score: 3.38 / 4
Dimension Score Finding
Architecture clarity 4 repository architecture and product-model surfaces now name the world-to-country publication model directly
Naming quality 4 root landings now use the governed world, region, and country publication vocabulary
Source-family coverage 3 13 directly explainable source-family pages keep the repository broader than one aDNA recovery story
Extraction completeness 2 animal sample extraction remains the weakest credibility dimension and still blocks stronger release language
Chronology integrity 4 chronology now has explicit provenance and cross-family comparison surfaces instead of living only in downstream date fields
Geographic extensibility 2 world, Europe-plus, Nordic, and country publication now share one lineage plus one onboarding contract
Map coherence 4 world, Europe-plus, and Nordic maps now exist as sibling scopes instead of one Nordic-first artifact with broad afterthoughts
Docs usability 4 handbook breadth holds and the report tree no longer carries link-farm pages at the root