Skip to content

Mastery Map

Page Maps

graph LR
  family["Reproducible Research"]
  program["Deep Dive DVC"]
  section["Orientation"]
  page["Mastery Map"]
  capstone["Capstone evidence"]

  family --> program --> section --> page
  page -.applies in.-> capstone
flowchart LR
  orient["Orient on the page map"] --> read["Read the main claim and examples"]
  read --> inspect["Inspect the related code, proof, or capstone surface"]
  inspect --> verify["Run or review the verification path"]
  verify --> apply["Apply the idea back to the module and capstone"]

Use this page when the course is no longer about first contact or ordinary study rhythm. The goal here is stewardship: decide what can still be trusted, what must change, and what no longer belongs inside DVC at all.

Return by late-course pressure

If the pressure is... Revisit Keep nearby Capstone cross-check
what downstream users are actually allowed to trust Module 09 Review Checklist Capstone Review Worksheet
whether the promoted bundle is smaller and clearer than the full repository Module 09 Boundary Review Prompts Capstone Proof Guide
whether a recovery or migration story is still honest Modules 08 to 10 Topic Boundaries Capstone Proof Guide
whether DVC should keep owning this concern at all Module 10 Anti-Pattern Atlas Capstone Review Worksheet

Late-course route

Module 09: promotion and auditability

Use Module 09 when the review question is downstream trust.

  • Re-read the module as a boundary question, not as a release ceremony.
  • Ask which surfaces are public contract and which remain repository-internal evidence.

Module 10: migration and governance

Use Module 10 when the review question is long-lived ownership.

  • Re-read the module as a stewardship question, not as a victory lap.
  • Ask which responsibilities DVC still owns honestly and which should move to a smaller, clearer boundary.

Good mastery signal

You are using this map well when you can say all three:

  • what the authoritative surface is for the current trust claim
  • which proof route is proportionate instead of theatrical
  • what you would still reject even if the repository currently passes its commands