Mastery Map¶
Page Maps¶
graph LR
family["Reproducible Research"]
program["Deep Dive DVC"]
section["Orientation"]
page["Mastery Map"]
capstone["Capstone evidence"]
family --> program --> section --> page
page -.applies in.-> capstone
flowchart LR
orient["Orient on the page map"] --> read["Read the main claim and examples"]
read --> inspect["Inspect the related code, proof, or capstone surface"]
inspect --> verify["Run or review the verification path"]
verify --> apply["Apply the idea back to the module and capstone"]
Use this page when the course is no longer about first contact or ordinary study rhythm. The goal here is stewardship: decide what can still be trusted, what must change, and what no longer belongs inside DVC at all.
Return by late-course pressure¶
| If the pressure is... | Revisit | Keep nearby | Capstone cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|
| what downstream users are actually allowed to trust | Module 09 | Review Checklist | Capstone Review Worksheet |
| whether the promoted bundle is smaller and clearer than the full repository | Module 09 | Boundary Review Prompts | Capstone Proof Guide |
| whether a recovery or migration story is still honest | Modules 08 to 10 | Topic Boundaries | Capstone Proof Guide |
| whether DVC should keep owning this concern at all | Module 10 | Anti-Pattern Atlas | Capstone Review Worksheet |
Late-course route¶
Module 09: promotion and auditability¶
Use Module 09 when the review question is downstream trust.
- Re-read the module as a boundary question, not as a release ceremony.
- Ask which surfaces are public contract and which remain repository-internal evidence.
Module 10: migration and governance¶
Use Module 10 when the review question is long-lived ownership.
- Re-read the module as a stewardship question, not as a victory lap.
- Ask which responsibilities DVC still owns honestly and which should move to a smaller, clearer boundary.
Good mastery signal¶
You are using this map well when you can say all three:
- what the authoritative surface is for the current trust claim
- which proof route is proportionate instead of theatrical
- what you would still reject even if the repository currently passes its commands