Skip to content

Domain Guide

Guide Maps

graph LR
  family["Reproducible Research"]
  program["Deep Dive DVC"]
  guide["Capstone docs"]
  section["Docs"]
  page["Domain Guide"]
  proof["Proof route"]

  family --> program --> guide --> section --> page
  page -.checks against.-> proof
flowchart LR
  orient["Read the guide boundary"] --> inspect["Inspect the named files, targets, or artifacts"]
  inspect --> run["Run the confirm, demo, selftest, or proof command"]
  run --> compare["Compare output with the stated contract"]
  compare --> review["Return to the course claim with evidence"]

Use this guide when the capstone feels structurally clear but the modeled problem still feels abstract. The goal is to make the incident-escalation story concrete before you reason about DVC state and review routes.

What the raw dataset represents

The repository models service incidents that may or may not escalate into a broader operational response. Each row describes one incident with a small feature set that a team could plausibly review before deciding whether closer intervention is likely.

Column meanings

Column Meaning Why it matters
incident_id stable incident identifier keeps split logic and review examples tied to a real record
team owning service or platform team lets prediction review stay anchored in operational ownership
backlog_days age of the incident in days captures unresolved operational pressure
reopened_count number of reopen events captures churn and instability
integration_touchpoints number of connected systems involved captures coordination breadth
customer_tier customer criticality bucket captures business impact pressure
weekend_handoff whether the incident crossed a weekend handoff captures time-and-coordination friction
severity_score numeric severity proxy captures direct operational urgency
escalated whether the incident escalated is the target outcome the model predicts

What the publish bundle is trying to help a reviewer answer

  • what population the model saw and evaluated
  • what threshold was used for the promoted decision policy
  • which eval rows were predicted correctly or incorrectly
  • whether the promoted metrics describe a problem a human can still reason about later

Best companion guides

  • read Capstone Architecture when the domain is clear but the repository ownership layers are not
  • read Experiment Guide when the next question is how declared controls change the review meaning
  • read Publish Contract when the next question is which domain evidence survives into publish/v1/