Exercises¶
Page Maps¶
graph LR
family["Reproducible Research"]
program["Deep Dive DVC"]
section["Migration Governance Dvc Boundaries"]
page["Exercises"]
capstone["Capstone evidence"]
family --> program --> section --> page
page -.applies in.-> capstone
flowchart LR
orient["Orient on the page map"] --> read["Read the main claim and examples"]
read --> inspect["Inspect the related code, proof, or capstone surface"]
inspect --> verify["Run or review the verification path"]
verify --> apply["Apply the idea back to the module and capstone"]
Use these exercises to practice final stewardship judgment.
The strongest answers will name evidence, risk, repair, and ownership.
Exercise 1: Review a repository by evidence¶
Write a five-section review outline for a DVC repository:
- identity and state layers
- pipeline and experiment truth
- metrics, promotion, and release surfaces
- remote, retention, and recovery
- tool-boundary recommendations
For each section, name one file or command you would inspect.
Exercise 2: Plan one safe migration¶
A team wants to move promoted artifacts from publish/v1/ to
registry/incident-escalation/v1/.
Write a migration plan that preserves trust and rollback.
Exercise 3: Write a governance rule¶
Write one durable governance rule for future changes to params.yaml, dvc.lock, or
publish/.
Explain which state contract your rule protects.
Exercise 4: Intervene on an anti-pattern¶
A reviewer sees this comment:
We copied the best model to
outputs/latest/; consumers can use that.
Write a better review intervention with a repair path.
Exercise 5: Decide tool ownership¶
A team wants DVC to handle artifact lineage, deployment approval, model registry lifecycle, and alerting.
Explain which concerns DVC should own and which should probably belong to another layer.
Mastery check¶
You have a strong grasp of this module if your answers consistently keep five ideas visible:
- review starts from evidence surfaces
- migration should move one boundary with proof
- governance should be small and enforceable
- anti-patterns are shortcuts that damage state contracts
- DVC should own artifact lineage, not every production concern