Skip to content

Docs Governance Workflow

Atlas keeps dedicated docs governance validation so navigation, redirects, reference generation, and artifact honesty are enforced together.

Docs Governance Decision Model

flowchart TD
    Change[Documentation change] --> Classify[Classify change]
    Classify --> Editorial[Editorial correction]
    Classify --> Structural[Structural navigation change]
    Classify --> Contract[Contract or governance-impacting change]

    Editorial --> Light[Light review path]
    Structural --> Redirect[Navigation and redirect review]
    Contract --> Governance[Governance and compatibility review]

    Light --> Merge[Merge]
    Redirect --> Merge
    Governance --> Merge

This diagram helps maintainers avoid the most common docs mistake: treating every docs edit like the same kind of change. Atlas separates simple prose fixes from navigation moves and from changes that alter contracts, redirects, or governance meaning.

Repository Anchors

What This Workflow Protects

  • curated docs spine placement
  • redirect integrity when pages move or rename
  • alignment between authored docs and generated references
  • honesty about what is source of truth versus derived artifact

Practical Maintainer Rules

  • use the light path for editorial corrections that do not move meaning, placement, or contract claims
  • use the navigation path when URLs, section homes, or redirects change
  • use governance review when docs redefine a maintained promise, compatibility expectation, or workflow obligation
  • never treat a docs move as complete until redirects and generated navigation stay aligned

Main Takeaway

Docs governance is Atlas's way of protecting reader trust. The workflow exists so maintainers can distinguish a harmless wording improvement from a docs change that silently breaks navigation, compatibility promises, or repository truth.