Skip to content

Load and performance assurance

Atlas load evidence establishes a bounded operating envelope for a named release, dataset, topology, and workload. It is not a freestanding throughput number. A defensible verdict preserves workload identity, measurement validity, absolute budgets, baseline compatibility, and the full offered population.

From experiment to verdict

flowchart LR
    Question[Capacity or resilience question] --> Workload[Scenario + query corpus]
    Workload --> Run[Controlled environment + measured process]
    Run --> Valid{Measurement valid?}
    Valid -->|no| Invalid[Invalid run; repair evidence path]
    Valid -->|yes| Budget[Absolute thresholds]
    Valid -->|yes| Baseline[Compatible baseline]
    Budget --> Verdict{Both policies pass?}
    Baseline --> Verdict
    Verdict --> Claim[Bounded operating claim]
Layer Required identity Failure means
workload Scenario, query corpus, dataset, traffic model, cache condition, and fault The run answered a different question
measurement Offered rate, generator capacity, clocks, window, and required telemetry The result is invalid, not a product verdict
service Latency, completed work, errors, rejection classes, resources, and recovery The deployment missed an absolute contract
comparison Compatible approved baseline and regression policy Relative movement is unacceptable or incomparable

Absolute budgets protect service objectives. Baselines detect movement within those bounds. When policy requires both, the candidate must pass both.

Keep selection identities distinct

Surface Examples Meaning
executable manifest mixed, diff_heavy, hpa_validation_short Key resolved by ops load from load.toml
acceptance registry mixed, diff-heavy, pod-churn, load-under-rollout Declared operating experiment with metrics and budgets
lane metadata smoke, full, nightly, load-nightly Expected membership, not an execution receipt

Underscores and hyphens are significant. A report must preserve the exact manifest key and, for an acceptance claim, its separately resolved registry ID. A lane did not execute merely because a similarly named manifest entry passed.

Account for offered work

flowchart LR
    Scheduled --> Offered
    Scheduled --> Omitted[Generator omission]
    Offered --> Admitted
    Offered --> Rejected
    Offered --> Unknown[Timeout or transport uncertainty]
    Admitted --> Completed
    Admitted --> Lost[Error, cancellation, unfinished]

Record counts and reason classes for every edge. Report attempts separately from user operations so retries cannot manufacture throughput. Latency percentiles must not make timeouts disappear by using successful responses as the implicit population. If the accounting identities do not close within a declared tolerance, classify the run as invalid.

Resilience is an intersection

Experiment Claim it can support Claim it cannot support alone
nominal saturation Capacity knee, overload policy, and cheap-path survival Dependency or orchestration failure behavior
dependency fault Confirmed degradation, containment, and timed recovery Instance replacement or release compatibility
pod churn Withdrawal, capacity continuity, and replacement readiness Node, zone, or repeated-churn resilience
rollout and rollback Attributed mixed-version capacity and reversal Safety of an untested or unattributed change

The operating envelope is the intersection of exercised claims. Preserve failed, aborted, and invalid experiments; they show where the envelope or measurement authority ended.

Current execution boundary

The acceptance registry declares load-under-rollout and load-under-rollback as required nightly script scenarios, but both reference runner paths that are absent from the repository. Their registration and thresholds express intended coverage; they do not prove executable rollout or rollback load control. Promotion requiring either claim remains blocked until a real runner emits candidate- and target-bound results.

Route by question

Question Read
Which workload family answers the decision? Performance and Load
Which experiment and lane are intended? Scenario Registry and Load Suites
What constitutes a pass? Thresholds and Budgets
Is the baseline compatible and approved? Baseline Management
Where does saturation begin? Concurrency Stress
How does a confirmed dependency fault change behavior? Failure Injection Load
Does instance replacement preserve service? Pod Churn Resilience
Is a release change safe under attributed traffic? Rollout Under Load

A final claim should name the candidate, target profile, dataset, workload, offered load, duration, cache condition, dependency state, accepted metrics, and observation window. “Handles production load” is not an evidence-backed claim; the exercised boundary is.