Skip to content

Review Checklist

Use this checklist during DAG review to prevent silent compatibility, evidence, or documentation regressions.

Visual Summary

flowchart TD
    review[Review starts] --> ownership[Correct ownership?]
    ownership --> architecture[Architecture still honest?]
    architecture --> contracts[Contracts and semantics clear?]
    contracts --> tests[Tests adequate?]
    tests --> docs[Docs and links aligned?]
    docs --> approve[Approve]
    ownership --> request[Request changes]
    architecture --> request
    contracts --> request
    tests --> request
    docs --> request

Required Checks

  • change stays within clear crate/module ownership boundaries
  • tests cover modified behavior and relevant contracts
  • replay/diff semantics and reason-code meanings remain explicit
  • artifact evidence expectations remain intact and verifiable
  • docs links, examples, and code anchors match current repository state

Structural Checks

  • docs/bijux-dag contains exactly five section directories
  • each section contains exactly ten markdown files
  • no references to removed nested program/* docs remain

Next Reads