Review Checklist¶
Use this checklist during DAG review to prevent silent compatibility, evidence, or documentation regressions.
Visual Summary¶
flowchart TD
review[Review starts] --> ownership[Correct ownership?]
ownership --> architecture[Architecture still honest?]
architecture --> contracts[Contracts and semantics clear?]
contracts --> tests[Tests adequate?]
tests --> docs[Docs and links aligned?]
docs --> approve[Approve]
ownership --> request[Request changes]
architecture --> request
contracts --> request
tests --> request
docs --> request
Required Checks¶
- change stays within clear crate/module ownership boundaries
- tests cover modified behavior and relevant contracts
- replay/diff semantics and reason-code meanings remain explicit
- artifact evidence expectations remain intact and verifiable
- docs links, examples, and code anchors match current repository state
Structural Checks¶
docs/bijux-dagcontains exactly five section directories- each section contains exactly ten markdown files
- no references to removed nested
program/*docs remain