Installation And Setup¶
Choose one execution mode before troubleshooting setup:
- install
bijux-dag-cliwhen you need the releasedbijux-dagcommand - use
cargo runfrom a checkout when developing or verifying repository examples against the current source
Do not build from source and then invoke an unrelated bijux-dag found on
PATH. Executable identity is part of a trustworthy setup result.
Toolchain Requirements¶
The workspace pins Rust 1.86.0 with rustfmt and clippy in
rust-toolchain.toml. Cargo output is redirected to
artifacts/rust/target/ by repository configuration.
The stable local shell lane requires only the host tools used by the graph.
The retained file-processing example invokes python3. Container nodes
additionally require a supported container engine. Kubernetes and SLURM
backends require their documented command-line clients and shared-storage
contracts; they are not prerequisites for local shell execution.
Install The Released Command¶
bijux-dag-cli is the package name; bijux-dag is the installed binary.
commands defaults to the stable operator lane. Confirm that command -v
resolves the installation you intended before relying on the result in
automation.
The root bijux runtime can report official product ownership:
Those commands describe delegation. The standalone bijux-dag binary remains
the public DAG operator surface.
Run From A Source Checkout¶
From the repository root:
make bootstrap
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- version
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- commands
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- ... binds every example to the
current checkout. A release build alone does not add
artifacts/rust/target/release/ to PATH; invoke that binary by its explicit
path if release-mode behavior is the subject of the check.
Repository Proof Path¶
Run:
This is stronger than --help or a package test. It validates a checked-in
graph, inspects the effective graph, creates a cold retained run, verifies its
artifact, performs a warm cache run, replays the reporting boundary, and
finishes with strict verification. Evidence is retained under
artifacts/dag-demo/.
The demo proves the current binary against one repository-owned workflow. It does not prove arbitrary graph correctness, hostile-code isolation, or backend availability outside the local environment.
Manual Smoke Run¶
Use the manual path when the individual proof boundaries matter:
GRAPH_PATH="evidence/dag/authoring/examples/file-processing-report.dag.json"
SOURCE_DIR="$(pwd)/evidence/dag/authoring/examples/file-processing-source"
RUN_ROOT="./artifacts/setup-runs"
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- validate "${GRAPH_PATH}"
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- run --json "${GRAPH_PATH}" \
--out "${RUN_ROOT}" \
--run-id setup-file-processing \
--input "source_dir=${SOURCE_DIR}" \
--input "report_title=Setup Verification Report"
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- artifact-inspect \
"${RUN_ROOT}/run-setup-file-processing" \
render_report:report.md \
--json
cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- verify --json \
"${RUN_ROOT}/run-setup-file-processing" \
--strict
Validation proves graph acceptance only. The run proves that this environment executed the graph. Artifact inspection proves that one declared output can be resolved. Strict verification checks retained evidence consistency. Keep these claims separate when reporting setup success.
Failure Classification¶
| Failure | Check | Correct owner |
|---|---|---|
bijux-dag not found |
command -v bijux-dag and Cargo install output |
installation and PATH |
| wrong version | resolved binary path and bijux-dag version |
duplicate or stale installation |
| source command runs different code | use cargo run -p bijux-dag-cli --bin bijux-dag -- |
checkout selection |
| graph rejected | validation error and configs/dag/schema/dag.schema.json |
graph contract |
| required input missing | graph inputs declaration and supplied --input values |
invocation |
| node process missing | retained node trace and host PATH |
graph execution environment |
| container engine unavailable | node failure class and engine discovery | container backend |
| retained output absent or inconsistent | artifact registry and strict verification | artifact production or persistence |
Do not reinstall the command to address a schema or graph-input failure. Likewise, do not edit a graph to hide a missing host executable. Route the failure to the layer that owns it.
Setup Completion¶
A usable environment has:
- an identified executable and version
- a visible stable command inventory
- a known-good graph that validates
- a finalized run under
artifacts/ - an inspectable declared output
- successful strict evidence verification
For source development, make dag-demo supplies this proof. For an installed
binary, run an equivalent retained workflow owned by your deployment and keep
its graph, inputs, command envelope, run directory, and verification result.