Contributor Workflows¶
Contributors should be able to move through the repository in a repeatable order.
The healthy path is simple: understand the owning boundary, make the change in the owning location, update the proof that matches the change, and only then escalate to repository-wide automation when the work genuinely crosses package boundaries. The root should help that path feel consistent rather than magical.
Common Workflow Shape¶
- start in the relevant handbook section before editing shared files
- make package-local changes in the owning package when the behavior is local
- use root automation when the work spans docs, schemas, release flow, or more than one package
- update the explanation and proof in the same change series
Shared Contributor Anchors¶
CONTRIBUTING.mdfor repository expectationsMakefileandmakes/for shared entrypoints.github/workflows/for repository verification and publication flow- the handbook sections under
docs/for durable operational memory
Failure Signals¶
- a contributor has to ask which root command is “the real one” for common work
- maintainer-only workflow knowledge lives mostly in chat history or CI output
- the same cross-package procedure is being rediscovered from scratch
Purpose¶
This page records the normal repository workflow shape so contributors can move through shared work with less guesswork.
Stability¶
Update this page when the checked-in contributor path really changes.