{
  "schema_version": "sweden-lake-archaeology-sensitivity.v1",
  "country": "Sweden",
  "candidate_count": 0,
  "profiles": [
    {
      "profile_key": "context_conservative",
      "archaeology_weight": 0.03,
      "weights": {
        "human": 0.61537634,
        "direct_pollen": 0.14602151,
        "nearby_pollen": 0.07301075,
        "sampling": 0.07301075,
        "archaeology": 0.03,
        "animal": 0.04172043,
        "diversity": 0.02086022
      }
    },
    {
      "profile_key": "baseline",
      "archaeology_weight": 0.07,
      "weights": {
        "human": 0.59,
        "direct_pollen": 0.14,
        "nearby_pollen": 0.07,
        "sampling": 0.07,
        "archaeology": 0.07,
        "animal": 0.04,
        "diversity": 0.02
      }
    },
    {
      "profile_key": "context_emphasis",
      "archaeology_weight": 0.15,
      "weights": {
        "human": 0.53924731,
        "direct_pollen": 0.12795699,
        "nearby_pollen": 0.06397849,
        "sampling": 0.06397849,
        "archaeology": 0.15,
        "animal": 0.03655914,
        "diversity": 0.01827957
      }
    }
  ],
  "methodology": {
    "baseline_justification": "Archaeology receives 0.07 because it is contextual rather than direct lake or sampling evidence. It equals nearby-pollen and area-screen weight, remains below direct pollen, and remains far below human aDNA.",
    "archaeology_signal_contract": "SEAD site density contributes 0.40 inside the archaeology signal, numeric SEAD chronology 0.20, SEAD chronology overlapping nearby human aDNA 0.20, and coarse RA\u00c4 density 0.20.",
    "renormalization_rule": "When archaeology weight changes, every non-archaeology component is scaled proportionally so profile weights continue to sum to 1.00.",
    "decision_rule": "A lake should move upward on archaeology grounds only when linked SEAD records are inspected and temporally compatible. RA\u00c4 density alone is a discovery prompt, never sufficient promotion evidence.",
    "temporal_qualification_rule": "Each sensitivity row publishes the candidate's available temporal context windows and the count of nearby numeric SEAD records. A weight change remains a static robustness check; interpretation in a particular period requires a matching SEAD context window.",
    "ranking_note": "Sensitivity rank is score-ordered for isolating weight effects; the published engine rank separately applies direct-evidence tie-breakers."
  },
  "maximum_absolute_rank_shift": 0,
  "rows": []
}