Deep Dive Snakemake¶
Course Shape¶
flowchart TD
family["Reproducible Research"] --> program["Deep Dive Snakemake"]
program --> home["Deep Dive Snakemake"]
home --> modules["Modules 00-10"]
home --> guides["Guides"]
home --> reference["Reference"]
modules --> capstone["Capstone"]
guides --> capstone
reference --> capstone
flowchart TD
promise["Read the course promise and learner fit"] --> route["Choose one stable entry lane"]
route --> orientation["Anchor the workflow model in Module 00"]
orientation --> modules["Read the modules in order"]
modules --> proof["Use guides, reference, and capstone only when they answer the current question"]
Read the first diagram as the shape of the whole book. Read the second diagram as the intended learner route so the capstone and support shelves do not become accidental first lessons.
Deep Dive Snakemake teaches workflow design as a discipline of explicit file contracts, deterministic planning, safe dynamic behavior, and durable operational boundaries. The goal is not to collect workflow tricks. The goal is to build workflows another engineer can inspect, trust, and extend without folklore.
Use this course if¶
- you want a workflow model instead of disconnected Snakemake snippets
- you inherited a pipeline that runs but is hard to trust, review, or extend
- you already use Snakemake and now need stronger publish, profile, and workflow-boundary judgment
- you review whether a workflow can survive CI, shared filesystems, and long-lived change
Do not use this course as¶
- a syntax refresher detached from workflow contracts
- executor advice before workflow meaning is clear
- a reason to use dynamic behavior without explicit discovery and publish boundaries
Choose one starting lane¶
| If you are here because... | Start with | Stop when you can say... |
|---|---|---|
| Snakemake is still new | Start Here, Course Guide, Module 00 | what a truthful file contract is and why the capstone is not your first lesson |
| you need to repair an existing workflow | Pressure Routes, Module 03, Module 04 | whether the problem is workflow semantics, policy drift, interface sprawl, or incident pressure |
| you steward a long-lived workflow repository | Course Guide, Module 06, Module 07 | which surfaces are public, which are policy, and which proof route is proportionate |
Keep these support pages nearby¶
| Need | Best page |
|---|---|
| shortest stable entry | Start Here |
| route shaped by urgency | Pressure Routes |
| stable support hub | Course Guide |
| module titles translated into promises | Module Promise Map |
| module exit bar | Module Checkpoints |
| workflow split decisions | Workflow Modularization |
| smallest honest proof route | Proof Ladder |
| capstone entry by module and question | Capstone Map |
Module Table of Contents¶
| Module | Title | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Module 00 | Orientation and Study Practice | establishes the learner route, proof surfaces, and capstone timing |
| Module 01 | File Contracts and Workflow Graph Truth | teaches the workflow as a file-driven DAG instead of a script |
| Module 02 | Dynamic DAGs, Discovery, and Integrity | makes checkpoints and changing sample sets reviewable |
| Module 03 | Production Operations and Policy Boundaries | separates workflow semantics from operational policy |
| Module 04 | Scaling Workflows and Interface Boundaries | scales the workflow without losing explicit interfaces |
| Module 05 | Software Boundaries and Reproducible Rules | keeps helper code and rule meaning in the right layer |
| Module 06 | Publishing and Downstream Contracts | makes the public artifact boundary versioned and trustworthy |
| Module 07 | Workflow Architecture and File APIs | organizes the repository so ownership stays visible |
| Module 08 | Operating Contexts and Execution Policy | compares local, CI, and cluster policy without semantic drift |
| Module 09 | Performance, Observability, and Incident Response | reviews logs, benchmarks, and incidents with explicit evidence |
| Module 10 | Governance, Migration, and Tool Boundaries | finishes with stewardship and tool-boundary judgment |
How the capstone fits¶
The capstone is the executable proof surface for the course. It should corroborate a module idea that is already legible, not replace first exposure.
Use it in this order:
- learn the concept in the local module exercise
- choose the smallest honest route with Proof Ladder
- enter the repository through Capstone Map or Command Guide
- escalate to stronger review only when the current question actually needs it
Success signal¶
The course home has done its job when you know:
- where to start without random browsing
- which support page answers the next question
- why the capstone is a proof surface rather than a first-contact playground
- why later modules are consequences of earlier file-contract and publish-boundary choices
Failure modes this course is designed to prevent¶
- treating a workflow as a script rather than a file-driven DAG
- trusting a workflow because it ran once instead of because its contracts and proofs are visible
- using the capstone as first contact and confusing repository size with conceptual clarity
- treating publish, profile, and governance pages as substitutes for earlier workflow truth