Recovery Review Guide¶

Guide Fit¶

flowchart TD
  family["Reproducible Research"] --> program["Deep Dive DVC"]
  program --> pressure["A concrete learner or reviewer question"]
  pressure --> guide["Recovery Review Guide"]
  guide --> next["Modules, capstone, and reference surfaces"]

flowchart TD
  question["Name the exact question you need answered"] --> skim["Skim only the sections that match that pressure"]
  skim --> crosscheck["Open the linked module, proof surface, or capstone route"]
  crosscheck --> next_move["Leave with one next decision, page, or command"]

Read the first diagram as a timing map: this guide is for a named pressure, not for wandering the whole course-book. Read the second diagram as the guide loop: arrive with a concrete question, use only the matching sections, then leave with one smaller and more honest next move.

Use this guide when studying Module 08 or when reviewing whether the capstone’s recovery story is real rather than aspirational.

Questions to answer¶

Which restored artifacts came from the remote rather than the working tree?
Which downstream trust claims survive because publish/v1/ and dvc.lock were restored together?
Which repository facts still require internal evidence beyond the publish bundle?

Best route¶

Read Authority Map.
Run make PROGRAM=reproducible-research/deep-dive-dvc capstone-recovery-drill.
Run make PROGRAM=reproducible-research/deep-dive-dvc capstone-recovery-review.
Read Repository Layer Guide.
Inspect the recovery bundle beside Evidence Boundary Guide.