Domain Language¶
The language around bijux-canon-ingest should reinforce the real package
boundary. Good names shorten review. Weak names force people to keep asking
whether they are looking at local behavior or at something owned elsewhere.
This page keeps the package vocabulary stable enough that docs, code, commit messages, and review conversations can describe the same idea without drift.
Treat the foundation pages for bijux-canon-ingest as the package's durable self-description. If the package still feels blurry after this section, the boundary story is not clear enough yet.
Visual Summary¶
flowchart LR
page["Domain Language<br/>clarifies: own the right work | name the boundary | compare neighbors"]
classDef page fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#1e3a8a,stroke-width:2px;
classDef positive fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#14532d;
classDef caution fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,color:#7f1d1d;
classDef anchor fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#4c1d95;
classDef action fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#d97706,color:#7c2d12;
own1["ingest-local retrieval and indexing assembly"]
own1 --> page
own2["package-local CLI and HTTP boundaries"]
own2 --> page
own3["document cleaning, normalization, and chunking"]
own3 --> page
limit1["repository maintenance automation"]
page -.keeps outside.-> limit1
limit2["runtime-wide replay authority and persistence"]
page -.keeps outside.-> limit2
limit3["cross-package vector execution semantics"]
page -.keeps outside.-> limit3
anchor1["packages/bijux-canon-ingest/src/bijux_canon_ingest"]
page --> anchor1
anchor2["packages/bijux-canon-ingest/tests"]
page --> anchor2
anchor3["packages/bijux-canon-ingest"]
page --> anchor3
class page page;
class own1,own2,own3 positive;
class limit1,limit2,limit3 caution;
class anchor1,anchor2,anchor3 anchor;
Package Vocabulary Anchors¶
- package name:
bijux-canon-ingest - Python import root:
bijux_canon_ingest - owning package directory:
packages/bijux-canon-ingest - key outputs: normalized document trees, chunk collections and retrieval-ready records, diagnostic output produced during ingest workflows
Concrete Anchors¶
packages/bijux-canon-ingestas the package rootpackages/bijux-canon-ingest/src/bijux_canon_ingestas the import boundarypackages/bijux-canon-ingest/testsas the package proof surface
Use This Page When¶
- you need the package idea before the implementation detail
- you are deciding whether work belongs here or in a neighboring package
- you want the shortest honest explanation of what this package is for
Decision Rule¶
Use Domain Language to decide whether a change makes bijux-canon-ingest easier or harder to defend as one distinct role in the overall system. If the work makes the package broader without making its role clearer, stop and re-check the boundary before treating the change as a local improvement.
What This Page Answers¶
- what problem
bijux-canon-ingestis supposed to own on purpose - where the package boundary stops, even when nearby code looks tempting
- which neighboring package seams deserve comparison before the boundary is changed
Reviewer Lens¶
- compare the stated boundary with the modules, artifacts, and tests that are supposed to uphold it
- check that out-of-scope behavior is not quietly re-entering through convenience paths
- confirm that the package story still matches the real repository layout and neighboring package docs
Honesty Boundary¶
This page can explain the intended boundary of bijux-canon-ingest, but it cannot prove that boundary by itself. The real proof still lives in the code, tests, and neighboring package seams that either support or contradict the story told here.
Next Checks¶
- move to architecture when the question becomes structural rather than boundary-oriented
- move to interfaces when the question becomes contract-facing
- move to quality when the question becomes proof or review sufficiency
Purpose¶
This page records the naming anchors that should stay stable in docs, code, and review discussions.
Stability¶
Keep it aligned with the package's real import names, directories, and artifact nouns.