Skip to content

Entrypoints and Examples

The fastest way to understand the package interfaces is to pair entrypoints with concrete examples.

Examples are doing real work here. They let an impatient reader test whether the package story is credible without reconstructing usage from source alone.

Treat the interfaces pages for bijux-canon-index as the bridge between implementation detail and caller expectation. They should show what the package is prepared to defend before a dependency forms.

Visual Summary

flowchart LR
    page["Entrypoints and Examples<br/>clarifies: identify contracts | see caller impact | review compatibility"]
    classDef page fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#1e3a8a,stroke-width:2px;
    classDef positive fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#14532d;
    classDef caution fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,color:#7f1d1d;
    classDef anchor fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#4c1d95;
    classDef action fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#d97706,color:#7c2d12;
    surface1["HTTP app under src/bijux_canon_index/api"]
    surface1 --> page
    surface2["OpenAPI schema files under apis/bijux-canon-index/v1"]
    surface2 --> page
    surface3["CLI modules under src/bijux_canon_index/interfaces/cli"]
    surface3 --> page
    proof1["vector execution result collections"]
    page --> proof1
    proof2["apis/bijux-canon-index/v1/schema.yaml"]
    page --> proof2
    proof3["apis/bijux-canon-index/v1/pinned_openapi.json"]
    page --> proof3
    review1["tests/unit for API, application, contracts, domain, infra, and tooling"]
    review1 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
    review2["tests/e2e for CLI workflows, API smoke, determinism gates, and provenance gates"]
    review2 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
    review3["tests/conformance and tests/compat_v01 for compatibility behavior"]
    review3 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
    class page page;
    class surface1,surface2,surface3 positive;
    class proof1,proof2,proof3 anchor;
    class review1,review2,review3 caution;

Entrypoints

  • CLI modules under src/bijux_canon_index/interfaces/cli
  • HTTP app under src/bijux_canon_index/api
  • OpenAPI schema files under apis/bijux-canon-index/v1

Example Anchors

  • tests/e2e and tests/scenarios as executable usage guides
  • apis/bijux-canon-index/v1/pinned_openapi.json for HTTP contract shape

Concrete Anchors

  • CLI modules under src/bijux_canon_index/interfaces/cli
  • HTTP app under src/bijux_canon_index/api
  • OpenAPI schema files under apis/bijux-canon-index/v1
  • apis/bijux-canon-index/v1/schema.yaml

Use This Page When

  • you need the public command, API, import, schema, or artifact surface
  • you are checking whether a caller can safely rely on a given entrypoint or shape
  • you want the contract-facing side of the package before building on it

Decision Rule

Use Entrypoints and Examples to decide whether a caller-facing surface is explicit enough to depend on. If the surface cannot be tied back to concrete code, schemas, artifacts, examples, and tests, treat it as unstable until that evidence is visible.

What This Page Answers

  • which public or operator-facing surfaces bijux-canon-index is really asking readers to trust
  • which schemas, artifacts, imports, or commands behave like contracts
  • what compatibility pressure a change to this surface would create

Reviewer Lens

  • compare commands, schemas, imports, and artifacts against the documented surface one by one
  • check whether a seemingly local change actually needs compatibility review
  • confirm that examples still point to real entrypoints and not to stale habits

Honesty Boundary

This page can identify the intended public surfaces of bijux-canon-index, but real compatibility depends on code, schemas, artifacts, examples, and tests staying aligned. If those disagree, the prose is wrong or incomplete.

Next Checks

  • move to operations when the caller-facing question becomes procedural or environmental
  • move to quality when compatibility or evidence of protection becomes the real issue
  • move back to architecture when a public-surface question reveals a deeper structural drift

Purpose

This page records where maintainers can find real invocation examples instead of inventing them from scratch.

Stability

Keep it aligned with the checked-in examples, fixtures, and executable tests.