Public Imports¶
The public Python surface of bijux-canon-agent starts at the package import root and any
intentionally exported modules beneath it.
This page keeps import visibility honest. Not every importable symbol is public, and not every public symbol should be left implicit. Readers should be able to tell what the package is prepared to support as a Python-facing boundary.
Treat the interfaces pages for bijux-canon-agent as the bridge between implementation detail and caller expectation. They should show what the package is prepared to defend before a dependency forms.
Visual Summary¶
flowchart LR
page["Public Imports<br/>clarifies: identify contracts | see caller impact | review compatibility"]
classDef page fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#1e3a8a,stroke-width:2px;
classDef positive fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#14532d;
classDef caution fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,color:#7f1d1d;
classDef anchor fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#4c1d95;
classDef action fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#d97706,color:#7c2d12;
surface1["operator configuration under src/bijux_canon_agent/config"]
surface1 --> page
surface2["HTTP-adjacent modules under src/bijux_canon_agent/api"]
surface2 --> page
surface3["CLI entrypoint in src/bijux_canon_agent/interfaces/cli/entrypoint.py"]
surface3 --> page
proof1["workflow graph execution records"]
page --> proof1
proof2["apis/bijux-canon-agent/v1/schema.yaml"]
page --> proof2
proof3["trace-backed final outputs"]
page --> proof3
review1["tests/integration and tests/e2e for end-to-end workflow behavior"]
review1 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
review2["tests/invariants for package promises that should not drift"]
review2 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
review3["tests/unit for local behavior and utility coverage"]
review3 -.raises compatibility pressure on.-> page
class page page;
class surface1,surface2,surface3 positive;
class proof1,proof2,proof3 anchor;
class review1,review2,review3 caution;
Import Anchor¶
- import root:
bijux_canon_agent - package source root:
packages/bijux-canon-agent/src/bijux_canon_agent
Concrete Anchors¶
- CLI entrypoint in src/bijux_canon_agent/interfaces/cli/entrypoint.py
- operator configuration under src/bijux_canon_agent/config
- HTTP-adjacent modules under src/bijux_canon_agent/api
- apis/bijux-canon-agent/v1/schema.yaml
Use This Page When¶
- you need the public command, API, import, schema, or artifact surface
- you are checking whether a caller can safely rely on a given entrypoint or shape
- you want the contract-facing side of the package before building on it
Decision Rule¶
Use Public Imports to decide whether a caller-facing surface is explicit enough to depend on. If the surface cannot be tied back to concrete code, schemas, artifacts, examples, and tests, treat it as unstable until that evidence is visible.
What This Page Answers¶
- which public or operator-facing surfaces
bijux-canon-agentis really asking readers to trust - which schemas, artifacts, imports, or commands behave like contracts
- what compatibility pressure a change to this surface would create
Reviewer Lens¶
- compare commands, schemas, imports, and artifacts against the documented surface one by one
- check whether a seemingly local change actually needs compatibility review
- confirm that examples still point to real entrypoints and not to stale habits
Honesty Boundary¶
This page can identify the intended public surfaces of bijux-canon-agent, but real compatibility depends on code, schemas, artifacts, examples, and tests staying aligned. If those disagree, the prose is wrong or incomplete.
Next Checks¶
- move to operations when the caller-facing question becomes procedural or environmental
- move to quality when compatibility or evidence of protection becomes the real issue
- move back to architecture when a public-surface question reveals a deeper structural drift
Purpose¶
This page keeps the import-facing contract visible when refactoring package internals.
Stability¶
Keep it aligned with the actual package source tree and documented import paths.