Release and Versioning¶
Release work for bijux-proteomics-knowledge depends on package metadata, tracked release notes, and
the repository's commit conventions.
The release path is part of the product story because it determines how readers learn what changed and what stayed stable. This page should make package-local release mechanics understandable without separating them from repository rules.
Treat the operations pages for bijux-proteomics-knowledge as the package's explicit operating memory. They should make common tasks repeatable without relearning the workflow from logs or oral history.
Visual Summary¶
flowchart RL
page["Release and Versioning<br/>clarifies: repeat workflows | find diagnostics | release safely"]
classDef page fill:#dbeafe,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#1e3a8a,stroke-width:2px;
classDef positive fill:#dcfce7,stroke:#16a34a,color:#14532d;
classDef caution fill:#fee2e2,stroke:#dc2626,color:#7f1d1d;
classDef anchor fill:#ede9fe,stroke:#7c3aed,color:#4c1d95;
classDef action fill:#fef3c7,stroke:#d97706,color:#7c2d12;
step1["Evidence and claim models in src/bijux_proteomics_knowledge/"]
step1 --> page
step2["packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/pyproject.toml"]
step2 --> page
step3["Conflict and review surfaces in src/bijux_proteomics_knowledge/"]
step3 --> page
run1["tests/ for evidence trust and freshness behavior"]
page --> run1
run2["claim graph and resolution checks in tests/"]
page --> run2
run3["knowledge review packet contract checks in tests/"]
page --> run3
release1["pyproject.toml"]
run1 --> release1
release2["README.md"]
run2 --> release2
release3["CHANGELOG.md"]
run3 --> release3
class page page;
class step1,step2,step3 positive;
class run1,run2,run3 anchor;
class release1,release2,release3 action;
Release Anchors¶
- README.md
- CHANGELOG.md
- pyproject.toml
Versioning Anchors¶
- release version is explicit in
packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/pyproject.toml - release tags follow
v*and publish workflows are triggered from those tags
Concrete Anchors¶
packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/pyproject.tomlfor package metadatapackages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/README.mdfor local package framingpackages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/testsfor executable operational backstops
Use This Page When¶
- you are installing, running, diagnosing, or releasing the package
- you need repeatable operational anchors rather than architectural framing
- you are responding to package behavior in local work, CI, or incident pressure
Decision Rule¶
Use Release and Versioning to decide whether a maintainer can repeat the package workflow from checked-in assets instead of memory. If a step works only because someone already knows the trick, the workflow is not documented clearly enough yet.
What This Page Answers¶
- how
bijux-proteomics-knowledgeis installed, run, diagnosed, and released in practice - which checked-in files and tests anchor the operational story
- where a maintainer should look first when the package behaves differently
Reviewer Lens¶
- verify that setup, workflow, and release statements still match package metadata and current commands
- check that operational guidance still points at real diagnostics and validation paths
- confirm that maintainer advice still works under current local and CI expectations
Honesty Boundary¶
This page explains how bijux-proteomics-knowledge is expected to be operated, but it does not replace package metadata, actual runtime behavior, or validation in a real environment. A workflow is only trustworthy if a maintainer can still repeat it from the checked-in assets named here.
Next Checks¶
- move to interfaces when the operational path depends on a specific surface contract
- move to quality when the question becomes whether the workflow is sufficiently proven
- move back to architecture when operational complexity suggests a structural problem
Purpose¶
This page ties package-local release mechanics to the wider repository release model.
Stability¶
Keep it aligned with the package metadata and current versioning configuration.