Operations

This section is for maintainers who need to change bijux-proteomics-knowledge without guessing.

Unlike agentic-proteins, this package is import-first. There is no published CLI or HTTP service surface. Operational work here mostly means:

• managing package metadata and release notes
• validating library behavior with package tests
• confirming schema, evidence, and claim workflows remain stable for callers

Visual Summary

flowchart LR
    change["change in evidence or claim behavior"]
    tests["run package tests in packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/tests"]
    metadata["verify pyproject + README + CHANGELOG"]
    release["release via tag-triggered workflow"]
    change --> tests --> metadata --> release

Pages in This Section

• Installation and Setup
• Local Development
• Common Workflows
• Observability and Diagnostics
• Performance and Scaling
• Failure Recovery
• Release and Versioning
• Security and Safety
• Deployment Boundaries

Read Across the Package

• Foundation when you need the package boundary and ownership story first
• Architecture when the question becomes structural, modular, or execution-oriented
• Interfaces when the question becomes caller-facing, schema-facing, or contract-facing
• Quality when the question becomes proof, risk, trust, or review sufficiency

Concrete Anchors

• packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/pyproject.toml for package metadata
• packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/README.md for local package framing
• packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/tests for executable operational backstops
• packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/src/bijux_proteomics_knowledge for the import surface

Use This Page When

• you are installing, running, diagnosing, or releasing the package
• you need repeatable operational anchors rather than architectural framing
• you are responding to package behavior in local work, CI, or incident pressure

Decision Rule

Use Operations to decide whether a maintainer can repeat the package workflow from checked-in assets instead of memory. If a step works only because someone already knows the trick, the workflow is not documented clearly enough yet.

What This Page Answers

• how maintainers should operate an import-first package safely
• which files must be updated together before release
• where to verify evidence/claim behavior before publishing

Reviewer Lens

• verify that setup, workflow, and release statements still match package metadata and current commands
• check that operational guidance still points at real diagnostics and validation paths
• confirm that maintainer advice still works under current local and CI expectations

Honesty Boundary

This page explains how bijux-proteomics-knowledge is expected to be operated, but it does not replace package metadata, actual runtime behavior, or validation in a real environment. A workflow is only trustworthy if a maintainer can still repeat it from the checked-in assets named here.

Next Checks

• move to interfaces when the operational path depends on a specific surface contract
• move to quality when the question becomes whether the workflow is sufficiently proven
• move back to architecture when operational complexity suggests a structural problem

Purpose

This page gives maintainers a reliable starting path for practical package operations.

Stability

This page is part of the canonical package docs spine. Keep it aligned with the current package boundary and the topic pages in this section.