Foundation¶
This section explains why bijux-proteomics-knowledge exists, what it owns on purpose, and where its boundary stops.
Read this section first when you need the durable package story before code detail. A quick skim should make the role, the boundary, and the neighboring seams legible.
Treat the foundation pages for bijux-proteomics-knowledge as the package's durable self-description. If the package still feels blurry after this section, the boundary story is not clear enough yet.
Visual Summary¶
flowchart LR
own1["evidence records and trust scoring"]
own2["claim lifecycle and decision lineage"]
own3["conflict detection and resolution policies"]
out1["program lifecycle ownership (core)"]
out2["ranking and recommendation policy (intelligence)"]
out3["lab scheduling and assay execution logic (lab)"]
own1 --> own2 --> own3
own1 -.not owned.-> out1
own2 -.not owned.-> out2
own3 -.not owned.-> out3
Pages in This Section¶
- Package Overview
- Scope and Non-Goals
- Ownership Boundary
- Repository Fit
- Capability Map
- Domain Language
- Lifecycle Overview
- Dependencies and Adjacencies
- Change Principles
Read Across the Package¶
- Architecture when the question becomes structural, modular, or execution-oriented
- Interfaces when the question becomes caller-facing, schema-facing, or contract-facing
- Operations when the question becomes procedural, environmental, diagnostic, or release-oriented
- Quality when the question becomes proof, risk, trust, or review sufficiency
Concrete Anchors¶
packages/bijux-proteomics-knowledgeas the package rootpackages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/src/bijux_proteomics_knowledgeas the import boundarypackages/bijux-proteomics-knowledge/testsas the package proof surface
Use This Page When¶
- you need the package idea before the implementation detail
- you are deciding whether work belongs here or in a neighboring package
- you want the shortest honest explanation of what this package is for
Decision Rule¶
Use Foundation to decide whether a change makes bijux-proteomics-knowledge easier or harder to defend as one distinct role in the overall system. If the work makes the package broader without making its role clearer, stop and re-check the boundary before treating the change as a local improvement.
What This Page Answers¶
- what problem
bijux-proteomics-knowledgeis supposed to own on purpose - where the package boundary stops, even when nearby code looks tempting
- which neighboring package seams deserve comparison before changing ownership
Reviewer Lens¶
- compare the stated boundary with the modules, artifacts, and tests that are supposed to uphold it
- check that out-of-scope behavior is not quietly re-entering through convenience paths
- confirm that the package story still matches the real repository layout and neighboring package docs
Honesty Boundary¶
This page can explain the intended boundary of bijux-proteomics-knowledge, but it cannot prove that boundary by itself. The real proof still lives in the code, tests, and neighboring package seams that either support or contradict the story told here.
Next Checks¶
- move to architecture when the question becomes structural rather than boundary-oriented
- move to interfaces when the question becomes contract-facing
- move to quality when the question becomes proof or review sufficiency
Purpose¶
This page explains how to use the foundation section for bijux-proteomics-knowledge without repeating the detail that belongs on the topic pages beneath it.
Stability¶
This page is part of the canonical package docs spine. Keep it aligned with the current package boundary and the topic pages in this section.